Investors in search of real estate exposure without the direct ownership of property often turn to Real Estate ETFs. In the vast world of ETFs, [FREL](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/frel) and [SCHH](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/schh) emerge as two prominent players. How do these two measure up when pitted against each other? This blog will provide a comprehensive comparison, analyzing their sectors, top holdings, capitalization strategy, and tracking exposure.

## FREL VS SCHH: Overview
Both FREL (Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF) and SCHH (Schwab U.S. [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF) are designed to offer investors exposure to the U.S real estate sector. While FREL tracks the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index, which encompasses a broader range of real estate investments, SCHH shadows the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. These underlying indices play a significant role in shaping the ETFs' performance and sector allocation.

## FREL VS SCHH: Sectors and Top Holdings
Peeling back the layers, FREL's diversified holdings spread across residential REITs, retail REITs, office REITs, and more. This broad spectrum is reflective of the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index's comprehensive approach to the real estate sector.
On the other hand, SCHH's top holdings are a bit more concentrated, thanks to its alignment with the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. Investors may find a heftier allocation towards sectors like specialized REITs, residential REITs, and office REITs.
Though both ETFs provide a solid foundation for real estate exposure, their sector allocation can influence their performance during sector-specific boom or downturn periods. Therefore, understanding these differences is crucial when determining which ETF aligns with one's investment goals.


![FREL overlap FREL VS SCHH](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## FREL VS SCHH: Capitalization strategy
Capitalization strategy delves into the ETFs' preference for large-cap, mid-cap, or small-cap companies. FREL, given its alignment with the MSCI index, leans more towards a mix of large and mid-cap real estate companies. This blend potentially offers stability from the large caps, combined with the growth potential of mid-caps.
SCHH, by contrast, with its allegiance to the Dow Jones Index, is often more large-cap oriented. For investors who prioritize stability and established players in the real estate realm, SCHH might be more appealing.

## FREL VS SCHH: Tracking and Exposure
One of the pivotal factors in ETF investment is the tracking error. It measures how closely an ETF follows its benchmark index. Historically, both FREL and SCHH have demonstrated commendable tracking accuracy. However, slight differences might emerge owing to management fees and the inherent differences in their respective indices.
Exposure-wise, FREL, with its broader index alignment, offers a more extensive glimpse into the real estate sector. SCHH, being more selective, provides a more concentrated look. Depending on an investor's appetite for diversification versus concentration, one might seem more attractive than the other.

## Conclusion
When analyzing FREL VS SCHH, both ETFs present their unique strengths and considerations. FREL offers a broader exposure, ideal for those looking for comprehensive real estate representation in their portfolio. On the other hand, SCHH, with its focused approach, might be more fitting for investors who have specific sector preferences or those prioritizing large-cap stability.
At the end of the day, the choice between FREL and SCHH boils down to individual investment objectives, risk tolerance, and desired sector exposure. Investors are advised to look beyond just past performance and delve deep into the nuances of each ETF, ensuring alignment with their financial goals.

## Sources
1. Fidelity. (2020). FREL - Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF.
2. Schwab. (2020). SCHH - Schwab U.S. REIT ETF.
3. MSCI. (2020). MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index.
4. Dow Jones. (2020). Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index.



[FREL ETF issuer](https://www.etf.com/)
[FREL ETF official page](https://www.etf.com/FREL)

#### FREL quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [FREL](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/frel) [Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/frel), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the FREL and SCHH ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

FREL VS SCHH

When navigating the intricate world of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), investors often grapple with choices that might appear convoluted. Two of the eminent ETFs that come into question are [REET](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reet) and [SCHH](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/schh). Both of these funds provide exposure to real estate sectors, albeit with some distinct differences. This article aims to elucidate those differences and provide clarity on which one might be the right fit for your financial portfolio.

## REET VS SCHH: Sectors and Top Holdings
The first step in understanding the differences between REET and SCHH is to dive deep into their sectors and top holdings. REET, which stands for iShares Global [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF, provides a broad-based exposure to real estate companies and REITs worldwide. This international exposure means that it diversifies across various countries, giving investors a taste of real estate dynamics in regions outside the US.
SCHH, or Schwab U.S. REIT ETF, on the other hand, focuses more on US-based real estate companies and REITs. It’s tailored for those who prefer to stick closer to the home turf and want to leverage the stability and growth potential of the US real estate market.
In terms of top holdings, while REET may include big international real estate names, SCHH would primarily be constituted of renowned US-based companies. This distinction is crucial for investors who are risk-averse and want to ensure they aren’t overly exposed to foreign market volatilities.


![REET overlap REET VS SCHH](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## REET VS SCHH: Capitalization Strategy
Capitalization strategy is a pivotal aspect when comparing REET and SCHH. REET tends to be more diversified in terms of market capitalization, including a mix of both large-cap and mid-cap REITs from around the globe. This approach provides an equilibrium of stability (from the large-cap companies) and growth potential (from the mid-cap entities).
Conversely, SCHH predominantly focuses on large-cap US REITs, which can offer more stability, especially for conservative investors. However, this can sometimes come at the expense of potential higher growth rates that might be observed in some international or mid-cap markets.

## REET VS SCHH: Tracking and Exposure
Tracking and exposure play a crucial role in determining the return on investments and the risks associated with them. REET, given its global outreach, tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REITs Index. This index is comprehensive, encompassing a vast array of real estate sectors worldwide, providing a balanced exposure to the international market.
SCHH, being US-centric, tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. This index is more reflective of the domestic market dynamics, offering exposure mainly to the US real estate sectors.
For investors who are keen on diversifying and hedging their risks internationally, REET would be the preferable choice. In contrast, those more comfortable with the familiarity of the US market would find SCHH more aligned with their goals.

## Conclusion
In the final analysis, the choice between REET and SCHH boils down to individual investor preferences, risk tolerance, and desired exposure. If global diversification and a mix of market capitalizations sound appealing, REET would be the go-to option. However, if stability and a focus on the robust US real estate market are priorities, SCHH stands out as the more suitable choice.
In either case, both ETFs offer a window into the dynamic and ever-evolving real estate market, and understanding their nuances is pivotal for informed investment decisions.

Sources:
1. iShares official website. Overview of the iShares Global REIT ETF (REET).
2. Schwab official website. Insights into the Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH).
3. MarketWatch. Comparative analysis of global and US REITs.
4. Financial Times. Tracking indices and their impact on REITs' performance.



[REET ETF issuer](https://www.ishares.com/us)
[REET ETF official page](https://www.ishares.com/us/products/268752/ishares-global-reit-etf)

#### REET quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [REET](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reet) [iShares Global REIT ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reet), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the REET and SCHH ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

REET VS SCHH

In the dynamic realm of real estate ETFs, two giants have consistently made headlines for their strategies and performance: [XLRE](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/xlre) and [SCHH](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/schh). These funds offer investors the opportunity to gain exposure to the real estate sector without the need to directly purchase properties. But how do they stack up against each other? Here's a head-to-head comparison to determine which might be the better fit for your portfolio.

## XLRE VS SCHH: Sectors and Top Holdings
When dissecting the portfolio compositions of both ETFs, one finds that there are both overlaps and differences. XLRE primarily focuses on Real Estate Management & Development and REITs. Notably, its top holdings typically include giants like American Tower Corporation, Prologis, and Simon Property Group.
SCHH, on the other hand, also has a heavy emphasis on REITs, with its top holdings comprising renowned entities such as Public Storage, Crown Castle International, and Equinix. While both ETFs center around real estate, their specific holdings and sector emphasis can lead to divergent performance, especially in niche market scenarios.


![XLRE overlap XLRE VS SCHH](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## XLRE VS SCHH: Capitalization strategy
Capitalization strategy essentially refers to the method of weighting the holdings within the ETF. XLRE tends to lean more towards a market capitalization-weighted strategy, which means companies with larger market caps have a more significant influence on the ETF's performance.
SCHH, while also using a form of market-cap weighting, has been known to occasionally adopt a slight tilt towards certain sub-sectors or companies that they believe have more growth potential or are undervalued.
Investors should be mindful of these capitalization strategies. While the market-cap strategy might offer more stability, a tilted approach can capture more niche growth opportunities.

## XLRE VS SCHH: Tracking and Exposure
In terms of tracking and exposure, both ETFs aim to emulate the performance of specific indices. XLRE tracks the Real Estate Select Sector Index, providing broad exposure to the US real estate sector. This means that its performance closely mirrors the real estate market’s overall ups and downs. If the sector performs well, so does XLRE, and vice versa.
SCHH, meanwhile, tracks the Dow Jones U.S. [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) Index, focusing on publicly-traded real estate investment trusts in the U.S. While this also provides broad real estate exposure, the emphasis on REITs can result in slightly different performance nuances compared to XLRE. This might appeal to investors specifically interested in the REIT space.

## Conclusion
Both XLRE and SCHH are powerhouse ETFs in the real estate sector, offering investors solid opportunities to diversify their portfolios with property-related assets without the direct ownership hassles. Their strategies, top holdings, and tracking mechanisms, however, do vary.
XLRE is a more generalist approach, suitable for investors wanting broad exposure to the real estate market. Its market-cap weighted strategy also gives it a certain level of stability, influenced primarily by the biggest players in the sector.
On the flip side, SCHH, with its specific focus on REITs, is for those who believe in the potential of these entities. Its occasional tilt towards undervalued sectors or companies offers the possibility of tapping into niche growth opportunities.
Ultimately, the choice between XLRE VS SCHH comes down to individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and beliefs about the future of the real estate market and REITs. No matter which you lean towards, diversification remains key.

### Sources
1. SPDR Series Trust. “Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE).” SPDRs.com.
2. Charles Schwab. “Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH).” Schwab.com.
3. Morningstar. "Comparative Analysis of Real Estate ETFs: XLRE and SCHH." Morningstar.com.



[XLRE ETF issuer](https://www.sectorspdrs.com/)
[XLRE ETF official page](https://www.sectorspdrs.com/mainfund/xlre)

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the XLRE and SCHH ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

XLRE VS SCHH

In today's finance world, ETFs have become an instrumental tool for investors seeking diversified exposure to specific sectors or strategies. Two notable Real Estate ETFs are the [RWR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/rwr) (SPDR Dow Jones [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF) and the [SCHH](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/schh) (Schwab U.S. REIT ETF). This article aims to pit RWR VS SCHH and provide a comparative analysis that will guide potential investors in making informed decisions.

## RWR VS SCHH: Sectors and Top Holdings
To get a feel for these ETFs, it's essential to understand where they invest. RWR focuses its investments primarily in real estate investment trusts (REITs) that compose the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. Its top holdings span across various sub-sectors including residential, office, and retail REITs.
On the other hand, SCHH tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index and focuses on large-cap REITs. Its portfolio includes prominent names in the retail, residential, and health care REIT sectors. One might wonder, given the overlap in index tracking, how different could RWR and SCHH be? Well, the difference lies in the weighting of the holdings, the expense ratio, and the assets under management.


![RWR overlap RWR VS SCHH](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## RWR VS SCHH: Capitalization Strategy
Both RWR and SCHH heavily emphasize large-cap REITs. This focus inherently brings about certain levels of stability and can protect investors from the extreme volatilities of smaller-cap investments. However, there are subtle nuances in their strategies.
RWR, for instance, takes a more diversified approach. Its assets are spread across a broader base of companies, ensuring that the performance of one or two holdings doesn't unduly influence the ETF's overall return.
SCHH, while also diversified, tends to be slightly more concentrated in its top holdings. This concentration could lead to outperformance in bullish markets if the top holdings do exceptionally well. Conversely, it could lead to underperformance in bearish markets.

## RWR VS SCHH: Tracking and Exposure
The essence of an ETF is its ability to closely track its underlying index. RWR and SCHH, as previously mentioned, both aim to track the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. However, tracking errors – the difference between the ETF’s return and the index's return – can vary.
Historical data has shown that both ETFs exhibit minimal tracking errors, a testament to their efficient management. Still, potential investors should be aware that no ETF will perfectly match its underlying index due to fees, transaction costs, and other logistical issues.
Exposure-wise, while both ETFs are rooted in the U.S. real estate sector, RWR offers a bit more variety in terms of sub-sector allocation. This can be advantageous for those looking for more comprehensive exposure to the U.S. real estate market. SCHH, with its slightly more concentrated approach, could appeal to investors who have a bullish outlook on its top holdings.

## Conclusion
Deciding between RWR and SCHH isn’t a straightforward task. Both ETFs offer robust exposure to the U.S. real estate sector, albeit with slight variations in strategy, holdings, and capitalization. RWR provides a more diversified approach, spreading its assets across a larger pool of companies. SCHH leans towards a bit more concentration in its top holdings, which can be a double-edged sword depending on market conditions.
Potential investors should align their choice with their risk tolerance, investment horizon, and specific outlook on the U.S. real estate sector's various sub-segments. As with all investments, due diligence, and continual monitoring are crucial.

<b>Sources</b>
1. SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) official website
2. Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH) official website
3. Morningstar: Comparative Analysis on RWR and SCHH
4. Investopedia: Understanding Real Estate ETFs.



[RWR ETF issuer](https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs)
[RWR ETF official page](https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs/funds/spdr-dow-jones-reit-etf-rwr)

#### RWR quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [RWR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/rwr) [SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/rwr), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the RWR and SCHH ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

RWR VS SCHH

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become a popular choice for investors seeking diversified exposure to the real estate sector. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive comparison between two prominent real estate ETFs: [ICF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/icf) (iShares Cohen & Steers [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF) and [SCHH](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/schh) (Schwab U.S. REIT ETF). We will explore key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## ICF VS SCHH: Overview
ICF and SCHH are both ETFs that offer exposure to the real estate investment trust (REIT) sector, but they differ in their approaches. ICF seeks to replicate the performance of the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while SCHH aims to track the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. Understanding these distinct strategies is crucial for investors looking to invest in the real estate sector.

## ICF VS SCHH: ETF Tickers and Full Names
The ETF tickers and full names of ICF and SCHH provide valuable information. ICF's ticker represents its issuer (iShares) and its focus on Cohen & Steers Realty Majors, while SCHH's ticker signifies its issuer (Schwab) and its broad U.S. REIT exposure. Knowing the tickers and full names simplifies the process of identifying and investing in these ETFs.


![ICF overlap ICF VS SCHH](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## ICF VS SCHH: ETF Issuers
Both ICF and SCHH are managed by reputable issuers, iShares and Schwab, respectively. Understanding the credibility and track record of these issuers can instill confidence in investors. It's essential to consider the issuer's reputation when choosing an ETF for your investment portfolio.

## ICF VS SCHH: ETF Sectors and Top Holdings
ICF primarily focuses on a wide range of real estate sectors, including residential, office, retail, and healthcare. SCHH, on the other hand, encompasses various subsectors within the U.S. REIT market. Analyzing the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs can help investors assess their alignment with specific real estate subsectors and investment objectives.

## ICF VS SCHH: ETF Capitalization and Strategy
Capitalization and investment strategy play significant roles in determining an ETF's risk and return potential. ICF has a substantial asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking diversified REIT exposure. SCHH's strategy focuses on providing exposure to the performance of U.S. REITs. Evaluating these factors will help investors make informed decisions based on their risk tolerance and investment goals.

## ICF VS SCHH: ETF Tracking and Exposure
ICF tracks the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while SCHH follows the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. These tracking methods differ in terms of their underlying benchmarks. Understanding how these ETFs track their respective indices and their exposure to the REIT market is essential for investors looking to align their portfolios with specific market segments.

## Conclusion
ICF and SCHH are valuable tools for investors seeking exposure to the real estate sector. However, their differences in issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure create unique opportunities for investors. To delve deeper into the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insights related to these ETFs and other financial instruments, consider using ETF Insider—an intuitive and user-friendly app.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.




[ICF ETF issuer](https://www.ishares.com/)
[ICF ETF official page](https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239482/ishares-cohen-steers-reit-etf)

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the ICF and SCHH ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

ICF VS SCHH

The world of finance is vast and continually evolving, with various instruments that can help investors to diversify their portfolios and manage risks. Two such instruments in the spotlight today are [FREL](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/frel) and [IYR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/iyr), which are both ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) focusing on real estate sectors. But how do they differ, and which one could be a better fit for your investment needs? This article dives deep into the similarities and contrasts between these two funds.

## FREL VS IYR: Sectors and Top Holdings
Both FREL and IYR aim to track the real estate industry, but their sectoral focus and top holdings may differ. FREL, or the Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF, tracks the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. This means it offers broad exposure to the real estate sector, including residential, commercial, and specialty real estate.
On the other hand, IYR, or the iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF, tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index. It primarily focuses on real estate stocks and REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts) in the U.S. market. Some of the top holdings in IYR might include well-known REITs, while FREL might diversify more widely across the entire real estate sector.


![FREL overlap FREL VS IYR](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## FREL VS IYR: Capitalization strategy
Capitalization strategies differ between FREL and IYR. FREL offers exposure to large, mid, and small-cap real estate companies, ensuring a broader market capitalization coverage. This diversified exposure can be advantageous for those who seek varied company sizes in their portfolio.
Conversely, IYR tends to lean more towards larger market capitalizations. This strategy can often lead to more stability, as large-cap companies typically have a longer track record and can weather economic downturns better than their smaller counterparts. However, they might also offer slower growth compared to mid or small-cap companies.

## FREL VS IYR: Tracking and Exposure
The ultimate goal of any ETF is to track its benchmark index as closely as possible. In this context, tracking errors can be pivotal in determining the efficiency of an ETF.
FREL, which tracks the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index, might have a tracking error slightly different from IYR. The composition of the MSCI index can lead to variances in the ETF's performance when compared to the benchmark.
IYR, which follows the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index, might also experience some tracking discrepancies. The reasons can range from the fund's management decisions to external economic factors.
Exposure is another vital factor when considering these ETFs. While both ETFs focus on the U.S. real estate sector, the specific industries within real estate that they target might differ. For instance, one might have a higher concentration in residential real estate while the other might lean more towards commercial real estate or REITs.

## Conclusion
FREL and IYR both offer investors a unique opportunity to gain exposure to the U.S. real estate sector without investing directly in properties. They both have their advantages and drawbacks.
FREL's broader exposure across different market caps and a varied approach to the real estate sector might appeal to those looking for diversification. On the other hand, IYR's focus on larger market caps and its specific tracking of the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index could be more attractive to investors seeking stability and a direct line into the U.S. real estate market through REITs.
In essence, the choice between FREL and IYR boils down to individual investment goals and risk appetite. Both ETFs have their unique strengths, and a comprehensive understanding of each will guide you in making the most informed decision.

Sources:
1. Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) official documentation.
2. iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) official documentation.
3. MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index official page.
4. Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index official page.



[FREL ETF issuer](https://www.etf.com/)
[FREL ETF official page](https://www.etf.com/FREL)

#### IYR quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [IYR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/iyr) [iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/iyr), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the FREL and IYR ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

FREL VS IYR

Real estate has always been a magnet for investors seeking diversification, cash flow, and potential capital appreciation. But with a broad spectrum of real estate investment options available today, it can be a challenge to determine the best fit for one's portfolio. Two leading real estate ETFs that often come under scrutiny are [REET](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reet) and [IYR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/iyr). How do these two giants stack up, and which may be right for you? Let's dive deep into the world of REET VS IYR.

## REET VS IYR: Sectors and Top Holdings
First and foremost, understanding the sectors and top holdings of each ETF is essential.
REET (iShares Global [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF) aims to provide exposure to real estate companies and REITs worldwide, including those in the U.S. The ETF's diversified approach means that investors have exposure to real estate markets in developed and emerging economies, which can offer growth opportunities not available with a U.S.-focused strategy.
IYR (iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF), on the other hand, is focused primarily on U.S. real estate companies and REITs. This gives the investor a concentrated exposure to the domestic market, with top holdings typically in well-known U.S. real estate entities.
When comparing REET VS IYR based on sectors and top holdings, a clear distinction emerges: REET offers global exposure, while IYR is U.S.-centric.


![REET overlap REET VS IYR](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## REET VS IYR: Capitalization Strategy
Capitalization strategy can play a crucial role in the potential returns and risks of an investment.
REET generally has a mix of both large-cap and mid-cap real estate entities, offering a balanced approach in terms of company size. This combination can provide stability during market downturns, while still giving room for growth and expansion.
IYR, being U.S.-focused, often leans more towards large-cap companies. This might mean more stability, as large-cap entities often have robust financial foundations. However, it can also mean missed opportunities from emerging players in the market.
In the REET VS IYR showdown on capitalization strategy, REET offers diversity in company size, whereas IYR leans towards the more established entities.

## REET VS IYR: Tracking and Exposure
Tracking and exposure determine how closely an ETF replicates its underlying index and the sectors it exposes investors to.
REET, with its global outreach, exposes investors to the real estate dynamics of various countries. This can be a double-edged sword. While the global approach offers diversification and potential growth from emerging markets, it also introduces geopolitical and currency risks.
IYR, tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index, offers exposure strictly to the U.S. This can be seen as a safer bet for those wary of international market dynamics. But, with all its holdings in one country, it may also be more sensitive to domestic economic shifts.
Considering REET VS IYR from a tracking and exposure perspective, REET is for those seeking global exposure and diversification, while IYR caters to those looking for concentrated U.S. exposure.

## Conclusion
In the grand REET VS IYR debate, there isn't a one-size-fits-all answer. The choice between the two largely depends on an investor's objectives, risk tolerance, and desire for either global or domestic exposure.
REET offers a broad, worldwide perspective on real estate, making it suitable for those looking for growth opportunities and diversification across borders. IYR, however, offers a focused approach on the U.S., ideal for those who understand and trust the domestic market more.
As always, potential investors should do their own research, consult with financial advisors, and consider their personal financial situation before making a decision.

Sources:
1. iShares Official Website
2. Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index
3. Financial market reports on REITs and real estate investments.



[REET ETF issuer](https://www.ishares.com/us)
[REET ETF official page](https://www.ishares.com/us/products/268752/ishares-global-reit-etf)

#### IYR quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [IYR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/iyr) [iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/iyr), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the REET and IYR ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

REET VS IYR

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become a cornerstone of modern finance, providing investors with diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison of two prominent Real Estate ETFs: [XLRE](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/xlre) (Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund) and [IYR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/iyr) (iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF). We'll explore their ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## XLRE VS IYR: Overview
XLRE and IYR are two ETFs that focus on the real estate sector, but they offer different investment strategies. XLRE, managed by State Street Global Advisors, tracks the performance of companies in the S&P 500 Real Estate Sector. In contrast, IYR, managed by BlackRock's iShares, provides exposure to the broader U.S. real estate market. These differing investment approaches result in distinct risk profiles and returns, which we will explore further.

## XLRE VS IYR: Sectors and Top Holdings
When considering XLRE, investors should be aware that it primarily invests in real estate investment trusts (REITs) that are part of the S&P 500 Real Estate Sector. Key holdings include well-known REITs like American Tower Corporation, Prologis, and Simon Property Group. On the other hand, IYR offers broader exposure by investing in a diverse range of U.S. real estate companies, including REITs and real estate management firms. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs can help investors align their portfolios with their specific real estate investment objectives.


![XLRE overlap XLRE VS IYR](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## XLRE VS IYR: Capitalization and Strategy
Capitalization and strategy play pivotal roles in an ETF's performance and suitability for investors. XLRE boasts a significant asset under management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors seeking targeted exposure to the S&P 500 Real Estate Sector. IYR, with its broader approach, aims to capture the overall performance of the U.S. real estate market. These varying capitalization levels and strategies result in different risk-return profiles, requiring investors to carefully assess their investment goals and risk tolerance.

## XLRE VS IYR: Tracking Methods and Exposure
Understanding how these ETFs track their respective sectors and provide exposure is crucial for investors. XLRE closely tracks the S&P 500 Real Estate Sector Index, reflecting the performance of REITs within the sector. In contrast, IYR tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index, which encompasses a broader spectrum of real estate-related companies. These tracking methods translate into different risk and return characteristics, making it imperative for investors to choose the ETF that aligns with their investment strategy.

## Conclusion
XLRE and IYR are distinct Real Estate ETFs, each catering to specific investment preferences. However, for investors seeking in-depth insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and more, ETF Insider stands as the ultimate tool. With its user-friendly app, it offers comprehensive information on these financial instruments and many others.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.



[XLRE ETF issuer](https://www.sectorspdrs.com/)
[XLRE ETF official page](https://www.sectorspdrs.com/mainfund/xlre)

#### IYR quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [IYR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/iyr) [iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/iyr), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the XLRE and IYR ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

XLRE VS IYR

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have gained immense popularity in the world of finance, providing investors with diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a thorough comparison between two prominent Real Estate ETFs: [RWR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/rwr) (iShares Cohen & Steers [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF) and [IYR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/iyr) (iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF). We'll delve into their ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## RWR VS IYR: Overview
RWR and IYR are both Real Estate ETFs, but they have differences in their investment strategies and holdings. RWR aims to track the performance of the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, providing exposure to large-cap real estate companies. On the other hand, IYR seeks to replicate the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index, which includes a broader spectrum of real estate investments. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for investors looking to gain exposure to the real estate sector.

## RWR VS IYR: Sectors and Top Holdings
The sectors within the real estate industry can vary widely, from residential and commercial properties to specialized real estate assets like data centers and healthcare facilities. RWR's top holdings include well-known real estate companies such as American Tower Corporation, Simon Property Group, and Prologis, among others. In contrast, IYR's portfolio consists of a diverse range of real estate holdings, including residential and commercial real estate investment trusts (REITs). Analyzing the sectors and top holdings can help investors align their investments with their specific real estate preferences.


![RWR overlap RWR VS IYR](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## RWR VS IYR: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
The capitalization and investment strategy of these ETFs can significantly impact their risk and return profiles. RWR boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to large-cap real estate companies. IYR, on the other hand, has a broader strategy, including mid-cap and small-cap REITs. The difference in capitalization and investment focus creates distinct investment opportunities and risk considerations for investors to evaluate carefully.

## RWR VS IYR: Tracking Methods and Exposure
RWR primarily aims to track the performance of a specific index composed of large-cap real estate companies. In contrast, IYR offers exposure to a broader range of real estate assets. IYR tracks an index that includes REITs engaged in various real estate sectors, providing investors with more diversified exposure to the real estate market. Understanding the tracking methods and exposure can help investors select the ETF that aligns best with their investment objectives.

Conclusion:
RWR and IYR are valuable investment options for those looking to gain exposure to the real estate sector, each with its own unique characteristics. To delve deeper into their holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insights, consider using ETF Insider—an intuitive and user-friendly app that provides comprehensive information on these and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services. Always conduct thorough research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.



[RWR ETF issuer](https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs)
[RWR ETF official page](https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs/funds/spdr-dow-jones-reit-etf-rwr)

#### IYR quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [IYR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/iyr) [iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/iyr), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the RWR and IYR ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

Blog