Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become a cornerstone of modern investment portfolios, providing investors with diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two notable ETFs: [RWR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/rwr) (SPDR Dow Jones [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF) and [REET](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reet) (iShares Global REIT ETF). Our exploration will encompass critical aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## RWR Vs REET: Overview
The RWR and REET ETFs focus on the real estate sector, allowing investors to gain exposure to the global real estate market. While both ETFs emphasize real estate, they differ in terms of their specific investment strategies. RWR tracks the performance of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) listed in the United States, providing investors with targeted exposure to this asset class. On the other hand, REET provides a broader global perspective by including REITs from various countries. This distinction in geographic focus and strategy shapes the overall risk and potential returns associated with each ETF.

## RWR Vs REET: Sectors and Top Holdings
Understanding the sectors and top holdings of an ETF can provide valuable insights into its underlying investments. RWR predominantly invests in sectors such as specialized REITs (healthcare, retail, etc.) and diversified REITs, which encompass a range of real estate sub-sectors. Some of its top holdings include companies like Prologis, American Tower Corporation, and Simon Property Group. In contrast, REET's portfolio includes REITs from around the world, diversifying its exposure across different regions and property types. This diverse approach ensures that investors are not overly reliant on a single geographic market or sector. 



![RWR  overlap RWR VS REET](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)




## RWR Vs REET: Capitalization and Strategy
Capitalization and strategy play a pivotal role in shaping an ETF's risk and potential returns. RWR boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicative of its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the US real estate market. Its investment strategy revolves around tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, which comprises a broad spectrum of US-listed REITs. In contrast, REET's strategy involves tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global REITs Index, encompassing REITs from both developed and emerging markets. This broader international approach offers investors the potential for global diversification while also introducing additional market risks.

## RWR Vs REET: Tracking and Exposure
The tracking and exposure methods employed by RWR and REET further differentiate their investment approaches. RWR's goal is to mirror the performance of the underlying index, which encompasses US-listed REITs. This direct tracking methodology means that RWR's returns closely mirror the performance of the index it follows. On the other hand, REET's strategy involves replicating the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global REITs Index. This approach exposes investors to global real estate markets, potentially offering both diversification benefits and unique challenges tied to international markets' volatility.

## Conclusion
In the realm of ETFs, RWR and REET stand out as distinctive options for investors looking to gain exposure to the real estate sector. While RWR zeroes in on the US REIT market, REET takes a global approach by incorporating REITs from around the world. Understanding the differences in geographic focus, sectors, capitalization, and investment strategy is crucial when selecting the right ETF for your investment goals. For those keen on delving deeper into the intricate details, including holdings, correlations, and overlaps, the ETF Insider app emerges as the ultimate tool. With its user-friendly interface, it empowers investors with comprehensive insights into these financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:
SPDR: "SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR)." https://www.ssga.com/us/en/individual/etfs/funds/spdr-dow-jones-reit-etf-rwr
iShares: "iShares Global REIT ETF (REET)." https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239694/ishares-global-reit-etf




#### REET quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [REET](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reet) [iShares Global REIT ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reet), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the RWR and REET ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

RWR VS REET

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become an integral part of the modern investment landscape, providing investors with an efficient way to gain exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent real estate ETFs: [RWR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/rwr) (SPDR Dow Jones [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF) and [XLRE](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/xlre) (Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund). We'll explore a range of key aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## RWR Vs XLRE: Overview
RWR and XLRE are two ETFs that offer distinct approaches to investing in the real estate sector. While both focus on real estate, RWR offers exposure to a broader range of real estate investment trusts (REITs), while XLRE concentrates on companies within the real estate sector of the S&P 500. Understanding their differing scopes and investment strategies will help investors make informed decisions.

## RWR Vs XLRE: Sectors and Top Holdings
The RWR ETF is designed to capture a wide array of real estate sectors, such as residential, commercial, industrial, and retail. Some of its top holdings include companies like American Tower Corp, Prologis Inc, and Crown Castle International Corp. On the other hand, XLRE's focus on the real estate sector within the S&P 500 means its holdings are concentrated in industries like real estate development and property management. 



![RWR  overlap RWR VS XLRE](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)




## RWR Vs XLRE: Capitalization and Strategy
RWR has a substantial asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors looking for diversified exposure to the real estate market. Its strategy revolves around tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. XLRE's strategy is to match the performance of the Real Estate Select Sector Index, which comprises real estate stocks within the S&P 500. The difference in capitalization and investment approach between the two ETFs can influence potential returns and risk profiles.

## RWR Vs XLRE: Tracking and Exposure
RWR aims to replicate the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, providing investors with broad exposure to various segments of the real estate market. On the other hand, XLRE tracks the Real Estate Select Sector Index, focusing on real estate companies within the S&P 500. This distinction in tracking methods and exposure offers investors different avenues to tap into the real estate sector.

## Conclusion
RWR and XLRE represent distinctive approaches to gaining exposure to the real estate market through ETFs. As investors seek to make informed decisions, tools like ETF Insider offer a valuable resource. This user-friendly app can provide insights into the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical details of these ETFs and other financial instruments, aiding investors in making well-informed choices.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:






#### RWR quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [RWR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/rwr) [SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/rwr), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the RWR and XLRE ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

RWR VS XLRE

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become a cornerstone of modern investment portfolios, offering investors easy access to diversified exposure across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth analysis of two prominent Real Estate ETFs: [ICF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/icf) (iShares Cohen &amp; Steers [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF) and [FREL](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/frel) (Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF). Our exploration will encompass key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methodology, and exposure.

## ICF Vs FREL: Overview 
ICF and FREL are two Real Estate ETFs that cater to investors seeking exposure to the real estate sector. However, they employ different approaches to achieve this goal. ICF primarily invests in Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) that own and manage properties, whereas FREL tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. This fundamental distinction in investment strategy leads to varying exposure and potential returns.

## ICF Vs FREL: Sectors and Top Holdings 
The ICF ETF provides exposure to a wide range of real estate sectors, including residential, commercial, industrial, and specialized properties. Its top holdings consist of well-known REITs like American Tower Corporation, Simon Property Group, and Prologis. FREL, on the other hand, captures the performance of large, mid, and small-cap real estate companies across the United States. Understanding the sectors and top holdings is crucial for investors aiming to align their investments with specific real estate sub-sectors. 



![ICF  overlap ICF VS FREL](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)



## ICF Vs FREL: Capitalization and Investment Strategy 
ICF boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors looking for exposure to the real estate market. The ETF's investment strategy focuses on providing broad coverage of the REIT market. FREL's strategy involves replicating the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index, which includes both residential and commercial real estate companies. The divergence in capitalization and investment strategy can lead to variations in risk and potential rewards.

## ICF Vs FREL: Tracking Methodology and Exposure 
ICF endeavors to mirror the performance of the Cohen &amp; Steers Realty Majors Index, capturing the returns of large and mid-cap REITs. FREL, on the other hand, employs a market-capitalization-weighted approach to track the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. This index comprises a broader spectrum of real estate companies, allowing for a comprehensive exposure to the U.S. real estate market. Investors must understand the nuances of tracking methodology to make informed decisions.

## Conclusion
In the realm of Real Estate ETFs, ICF and FREL cater to distinct investment preferences. While ICF emphasizes exposure to a diverse range of REITs, FREL aims to replicate the performance of a comprehensive real estate index. Investors seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other vital information can turn to ETF Insider—an intuitive app that provides valuable insights into various financial instruments, including ETFs.

Disclaimer: This article does not offer any investment advisory services.

Sources:





#### FREL quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [FREL](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/frel) [Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/frel), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the ICF and FREL ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

ICF VS FREL

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, offering investors easy access to a diverse range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison of two prominent Real Estate ETFs: [ICF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/icf) (iShares Cohen &amp; Steers [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF) and [REET](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reet) (iShares Global REIT ETF). We will explore various dimensions, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## ICF Vs REET: Overview
ICF and REET are both Real Estate ETFs, but they differ in their scope and geographical exposure. ICF primarily focuses on the U.S. real estate market, while REET provides a global perspective by including international real estate assets. Understanding this distinction is crucial for investors seeking real estate exposure across different regions.

## ICF Vs REET: Sectors and Top Holdings
ICF invests in a diverse array of real estate sectors, such as residential, commercial, and industrial properties. Its top holdings include well-known real estate investment trusts (REITs) like American Tower Corporation and Prologis. In contrast, REET offers exposure to a broader range of international real estate markets, including sectors like office, retail, and residential properties. Analyzing these sectors and top holdings is essential for assessing the potential risks and returns associated with each ETF. 



![ICF  overlap ICF VS REET](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)




## ICF Vs REET: Capitalization and Strategy
ICF's assets under management (AUM) reflect its popularity among investors looking for exposure to the U.S. real estate market. Its strategy involves tracking the performance of a broad index of U.S. REITs. On the other hand, REET's strategy is centered around providing investors with global real estate exposure, aiming to replicate the performance of an international real estate index. Understanding the differences in capitalization and strategy can help investors make informed decisions based on their investment objectives.

## ICF Vs REET: Tracking and Exposure
ICF offers investors exposure to the U.S. real estate market by tracking an index of U.S. REITs. This approach allows investors to benefit from the income potential of U.S. real estate properties. REET, however, takes a global approach, tracking a worldwide index of real estate companies. This broader exposure can be appealing to investors seeking geographical diversification in their real estate holdings. Evaluating the tracking methodologies and geographic exposure is crucial for choosing the ETF that aligns with your investment strategy.

## Conclusion
ICF and REET offer distinct avenues for investors to gain exposure to the real estate market, each catering to different preferences and strategies. For those seeking a deeper understanding of holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insights, ETF Insider presents itself as an invaluable tool. This user-friendly app offers comprehensive information about these ETFs and other financial instruments, enabling investors to make well-informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:






#### REET quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [REET](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reet) [iShares Global REIT ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reet), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the ICF and REET ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

ICF VS REET

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become a cornerstone of modern investing, providing investors with efficient exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth analysis of two prominent real estate ETFs: [ICF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/icf) (iShares Cohen & Steers [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF) and [XLRE](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/xlre) (Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund). We will explore a range of key aspects, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## ICF Vs XLRE: Overview
ICF and XLRE are both ETFs that provide exposure to the real estate sector. However, they differ in their underlying strategies. ICF seeks to track an index of real estate investment trusts (REITs), while XLRE aims to replicate the performance of companies within the real estate sector of the S&P 500. This difference in focus shapes their investment approaches and potential returns, which we will delve into further.

## ICF Vs XLRE: Sectors and Top Holdings
When considering ICF and XLRE, it's essential to understand their sector allocations and top holdings. ICF invests in a diversified range of REITs, including companies engaged in residential, commercial, and industrial real estate. On the other hand, XLRE's holdings are concentrated within the real estate sector of the S&P 500, which encompasses companies involved in real estate development, property management, and related activities. Analyzing the sectors and top holdings helps investors grasp the different ways these ETFs provide exposure to the real estate market. 



![ICF  overlap ICF VS XLRE](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)



## ICF Vs XLRE: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
Capitalization and investment strategy play a crucial role in assessing an ETF's risk and potential returns. ICF boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors seeking diversified exposure to the broader real estate market. XLRE, as a sector-specific ETF, focuses on real estate companies within the S&P 500, aiming to closely track their performance. The difference in capitalization and strategy between ICF and XLRE influences their risk profiles and potential rewards, making careful consideration essential for investors.

## ICF Vs XLRE: Tracking Methods and Exposure
Understanding how ICF and XLRE achieve their investment objectives is crucial for making informed decisions. ICF's tracking method involves replicating an index that comprises various REITs, reflecting the overall performance of the real estate sector. In contrast, XLRE tracks a specialized sector within the S&P 500, providing exposure to real estate-related companies. This difference in tracking methods leads to distinct risk and return profiles for these ETFs, highlighting the importance of aligning the investment strategy with individual goals.

## Conclusion
ICF and XLRE are two real estate ETFs that cater to different investor preferences within the real estate market. As you navigate these options, consider using ETF insider, an intuitive and user-friendly app that offers insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and more. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just starting out, leveraging the power of ETF insider can help you make more informed decisions about your investment strategies.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide any investment advisory services. Always conduct thorough research and consult with financial professionals before making investment decisions.

Sources:

ETF Issuer: https://www.sectorspdrs.com/
Official Page for the Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE): https://www.sectorspdrs.com/mainfund/xlre


:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the ICF and XLRE ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

ICF VS XLRE

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the way investors approach the financial markets, providing them with diversified exposure to a wide range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth analysis and comparison between two prominent real estate ETFs: [ICF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/icf) (iShares Cohen &amp; Steers [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF) and [RWR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/rwr) (SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF). We'll delve into various key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## ICF Vs RWR: Overview
ICF and RWR represent two distinct approaches to investing in the real estate sector. While both ETFs are designed to offer exposure to real estate investment trusts (REITs), they differ in terms of their underlying indices and investment methodologies. This section will explore the overarching differences between ICF and RWR, shedding light on their unique characteristics and potential benefits.

## ICF Vs RWR: Sectors and Top Holdings
The ICF ETF is tailored to track the performance of a comprehensive index of REITs, spanning various property types such as residential, commercial, and industrial real estate. On the other hand, RWR targets a narrower segment of the REIT market, focusing on the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of each ETF can aid investors in aligning their investment choices with their specific real estate sector preferences. 



![ICF  overlap ICF VS RWR](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)




## ICF Vs RWR: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
The capitalization and investment strategy of ICF and RWR are essential considerations for investors. ICF boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors seeking exposure to a broad spectrum of REITs. RWR's investment strategy revolves around tracking a prominent index of publicly traded REITs. The differing capitalization and investment strategies of these ETFs offer distinct potential returns and risk profiles that investors must evaluate meticulously.

## ICF Vs RWR: Tracking Methods and Exposure
ICF and RWR employ different tracking methods to provide investors with exposure to the real estate market. ICF seeks to replicate the performance of the Cohen &amp; Steers Realty Majors Index, which includes prominent REITs from various sectors. On the other hand, RWR endeavors to mirror the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, focusing on a narrower range of REITs. Understanding the tracking methods and exposure strategies of ICF and RWR is crucial for making informed investment decisions.

## Conclusion
In the realm of real estate ETFs, ICF and RWR offer distinctive avenues for investors to access the dynamic world of REITs. Each ETF has its own investment approach, underlying index, and potential for returns and risks. For investors seeking deeper insights into the holdings, correlations, and overlaps of these ETFs, ETF Insider emerges as an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, ETF Insider empowers investors with comprehensive information about these financial instruments and more.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs	RWR ETF issuer	
https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs/funds/spdr-dow-jones-reit-etf-rwr	RWR ETF official page 


#### RWR quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [RWR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/rwr) [SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/rwr), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the ICF and RWR ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

ICF VS RWR

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have redefined the landscape of modern investing, providing investors with an innovative way to access diversified exposure across a wide range of sectors and asset classes. In this comprehensive article, we'll delve into a detailed comparison between two prominent ETFs: [SCHH](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/schh) (Schwab U.S. [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF) and [FREL](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/frel) (Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF). Our exploration will encompass critical aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methodology, and exposure.

## SCHH Vs FREL: Overview
SCHH and FREL represent two distinct approaches to investing in the real estate sector. While SCHH seeks to track the performance of the U.S. real estate market, FREL aims to replicate the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. These differing strategies lead to variations in the sectors they cover and the risks associated with their respective portfolios.

## SCHH Vs FREL: Sectors and Top Holdings
SCHH predominantly focuses on various segments of the U.S. real estate market, including residential, commercial, and industrial properties. On the other hand, FREL's portfolio consists of holdings within the broader U.S. real estate industry. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs can offer valuable insights into the types of properties and companies they are exposed to, aiding investors in making informed decisions aligned with their investment objectives. 



![SCHH  overlap SCHH VS FREL](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)




## SCHH Vs FREL: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
SCHH commands a significant Asset Under Management (AUM), indicative of its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the U.S. real estate market. FREL's investment strategy revolves around mirroring the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index, which encompasses a broader spectrum of real estate-related companies. The differing capitalization and investment strategies influence the potential returns and associated risks, necessitating careful consideration by investors.

## SCHH Vs FREL: Tracking Methodology and Exposure
SCHH employs a tracking methodology designed to closely follow the performance of the U.S. real estate market. It holds a diversified portfolio of real estate investment trusts (REITs) and real estate-related companies. Conversely, FREL's tracking methodology involves replicating the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index, which includes a broader range of real estate holdings. Understanding these tracking approaches and exposure strategies can empower investors to select the ETF that best aligns with their risk tolerance and investment goals.

## Conclusion
SCHH and FREL offer investors distinct avenues for gaining exposure to the U.S. real estate market. Whether you're interested in specialized segments or a broader industry scope, these ETFs cater to various investment preferences. For investors seeking deeper insights into the nuances of holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical aspects, ETF Insider emerges as the ultimate tool. Through its user-friendly app, it provides comprehensive information on these financial instruments, empowering investors to make well-informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services. It's crucial to conduct thorough research and consult with financial professionals before making investment decisions.

Sources:
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH) Overview. Schwab.
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) Overview. Fidelity.
MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. MSCI.




#### FREL quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [FREL](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/frel) [Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/frel), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the SCHH and FREL ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

SCHH VS FREL

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of investing, providing a diversified approach to gaining exposure across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will embark on a comprehensive journey through a comparison between two prominent ETFs: [SCHH](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/schh) (Schwab U.S. [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF) and [REET](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reet) (iShares Global REIT ETF). We'll explore various dimensions, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## SCHH Vs REET: Overview
SCHH and REET are two distinct ETFs with a common focus on real estate investment trusts (REITs). However, they differ in their scope of geographical exposure. SCHH is primarily concentrated on U.S. REITs, while REET offers a global approach by including REITs from various countries. This contrast in geographical concentration leads to diverse market exposure and potential risk factors.

## SCHH Vs REET: Sectors and Top Holdings
The SCHH ETF is designed to track the performance of the U.S. real estate sector, encompassing residential, commercial, and industrial properties. Some of its top holdings include well-known REITs such as American Tower Corporation, Prologis Inc., and Crown Castle International Corp. On the other hand, REET provides a broader global exposure, incorporating REITs from different sectors like office, retail, residential, and healthcare properties. Analyzing the sectors and top holdings aids investors in choosing the ETF that aligns with their real estate investment preferences. 



![SCHH  overlap SCHH VS REET](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)



## SCHH Vs REET: Capitalization and Strategy
SCHH boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM) due to its targeted focus on the U.S. real estate market. Its strategy involves closely tracking the performance of U.S. REITs. REET, with its global perspective, captures the performance of REITs worldwide, aiming to provide investors with comprehensive real estate exposure. The differing capitalization and strategy between the two ETFs influence potential returns and risk, necessitating careful evaluation by investors.

## SCHH Vs REET: Tracking and Exposure
SCHH is designed to mirror the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, which includes various U.S. REITs. This tracking strategy aims to provide investors with a snapshot of the U.S. real estate market. In contrast, REET seeks to replicate the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, offering a broader global REIT exposure. Understanding the tracking methods and exposure strategies assists investors in making informed decisions based on their geographical and market preferences.

## Conclusion
SCHH and REET represent distinctive approaches to investing in the real estate sector. Investors seeking in-depth insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other pertinent information can turn to ETF Insider—an intuitive application offering a wealth of information on these and other financial instruments. With its user-friendly interface, ETF Insider equips investors with valuable tools to navigate the complexities of the ETF landscape and make informed investment choices.

Disclaimer: This article is intended solely for informational purposes and does not offer any investment advisory services.

Sources:
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH) Fact Sheet
iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) Overview




#### REET quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [REET](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reet) [iShares Global REIT ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reet), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the SCHH and REET ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

SCHH VS REET

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, providing investors with easy access to a diversified range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: [SCHH](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/schh) (Schwab U.S. [REIT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/reit) ETF) and [XLRE](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/xlre) (Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund). Our exploration will encompass crucial aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## SCHH Vs XLRE: Overview
SCHH and XLRE are two distinct ETFs that cater to investors seeking exposure to the real estate sector. While SCHH focuses on providing broad-based exposure to the U.S. real estate market, XLRE hones in on the real estate sector within the S&P 500. These differing scopes lead to varying portfolio compositions and risk profiles, a contrast we will delve into in the upcoming sections.

## SCHH Vs XLRE: Sectors and Top Holdings
The SCHH ETF offers exposure to a wide range of U.S. real estate segments, including residential, retail, industrial, and office properties. On the other hand, XLRE zeroes in on real estate companies within the S&P 500, featuring top holdings like American Tower Corporation, Prologis Inc., and Simon Property Group. Understanding the sectors and top holdings aids investors in aligning their investment objectives with the right ETF choice based on their risk appetite. 



![SCHH  overlap SCHH VS XLRE](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)




## SCHH Vs XLRE: Capitalization and Strategy
SCHH boasts a significant asset under management (AUM) figure, highlighting its appeal among investors looking to tap into the U.S. real estate market. XLRE follows the strategy of tracking the performance of the Real Estate Select Sector Index. The divergence in capitalization and strategy creates potential variations in risk and returns, underscoring the importance of evaluating these aspects when considering either ETF.

## SCHH Vs XLRE: Tracking and Exposure
SCHH aims to provide investors with comprehensive exposure to the broader U.S. real estate market, including various property types and real estate investment trusts (REITs). XLRE, on the other hand, seeks to mirror the performance of real estate companies within the S&P 500. This difference in tracking and exposure methods underscores the necessity of understanding the underlying indexes and their constituents when making investment decisions.

## Conclusion
SCHH and XLRE stand as distinct offerings within the real estate ETF landscape, catering to investors with differing preferences and objectives. For those keen on gaining deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other intricate details, ETF Insider emerges as the ultimate tool. With its user-friendly app, it empowers investors to explore these aspects and more across various financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:






:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the SCHH and XLRE ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

Blog