Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape by offering diversified exposure to a wide range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we'll delve into a comprehensive comparison between two prominent gold-backed ETFs: GLDL (Gold Bullion Strategy ETF) and [DGL](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/dgl) (Invesco DB Gold Fund). We'll take a closer look at their ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategies, tracking methods, and exposure.

## GLDL VS DGL: Overview
GLDL and DGL are two ETFs that provide investors with exposure to the price of gold, a precious metal renowned for its value and stability. While both ETFs are centered around gold, they differ in their strategies and underlying assets. GLDL focuses on investing in gold futures contracts and gold-related ETFs, while DGL tracks the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold Excess Return™. This distinction in investment approach creates varying levels of risk and return potential for investors.

## GLDL VS DGL: Tickers and Issuers
GLDL and DGL can be easily identified by their distinct ETF tickers. GLDL is managed by Sprott Asset Management, and its ticker symbol reflects its focus on gold: "GLDL." On the other hand, DGL is overseen by Invesco and can be recognized by its ticker symbol "DGL." Understanding the issuers and tickers is crucial for investors when differentiating between various gold-backed ETFs in the market.


![GLDL overlap GLDL VS DGL](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## GLDL VS DGL: Sectors and Top Holdings
GLDL's investment strategy results in a diversified portfolio that includes gold futures contracts and gold-related ETFs. In contrast, DGL tracks an index that primarily invests in gold futures contracts. These distinct strategies influence the sectors and top holdings within each ETF. While GLDL's holdings might include a mix of gold-related equities and derivatives, DGL's holdings are focused on gold futures. Investors should consider their preferences for physical gold exposure versus exposure through futures contracts when evaluating these ETFs.

## GLDL VS DGL: Capitalization and Strategies
The capitalization and strategies of GLDL and DGL further differentiate their investment approaches. GLDL's asset under management (AUM) reflects the investor interest in its strategy of combining gold futures and ETFs. On the other hand, DGL's strategy is centered around tracking a specific index, which might influence its AUM differently. Investors should assess the differences in capitalization and strategies to align with their risk tolerance and investment goals.

## GLDL VS DGL: Tracking and Exposure
Both GLDL and DGL aim to provide investors with exposure to the price movement of gold. GLDL achieves this through a combination of gold futures contracts and gold-related ETFs, while DGL tracks a gold futures index. Understanding the tracking methods and exposure mechanisms is essential for investors to determine which ETF aligns better with their investment strategy and desired level of gold exposure.

## Conclusion
GLDL and DGL offer distinct ways for investors to gain exposure to the price of gold, a precious metal with a long history of value. Whether investors prefer exposure through physical gold holdings or gold futures contracts, these ETFs provide opportunities for diversification and potential growth. To explore deeper insights into their holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other valuable information, investors can rely on the ETF Insider app. With its user-friendly interface, the app empowers investors with essential details about these and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

GLDL official website: [link]
DGL official website: [link]





:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the GLDL and DGL ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

GLDL VS DGL

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have revolutionized the way investors approach financial markets, providing a convenient and diversified way to gain exposure to various asset classes. In this article, we will delve into a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: [AAAU](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/aaau) (Perth Mint Physical Gold ETF) and [DGL](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/dgl) (Invesco DB Gold Fund). Our exploration will cover essential aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.
## AAAU VS DGL: Overview
AAAU and DGL represent distinct investment opportunities within the precious metals sector. AAAU focuses on physical gold exposure, with its underlying assets stored securely in a vault. In contrast, DGL is designed to track the performance of a rules-based index that consists of gold futures contracts. Understanding the nuances of these ETFs is crucial for investors seeking exposure to the precious metals market.

## AAAU VS DGL: Sectors and Top Holdings
AAAU's primary sector revolves around the ownership of physical gold, providing investors with direct exposure to the underlying asset. DGL's holdings consist of gold futures contracts, making it a derivative-based investment vehicle. While AAAU's holdings are inherently tied to the fluctuations in gold prices, DGL's returns are influenced by both gold price movements and futures market dynamics.



![AAAU overlap AAAU VS DGL](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## AAAU VS DGL: Capitalization and Strategy
AAAU and DGL differ in terms of their asset under management (AUM) and investment strategies. AAAU's AUM reflects the demand for physical gold ownership, attracting investors who value the tangible nature of the asset. DGL, on the other hand, employs a strategy based on futures contracts, allowing investors to gain exposure to gold price movements without direct ownership of physical gold. The differences in capitalization and strategy contribute to distinct risk and return profiles.

## AAAU VS DGL: Tracking and Exposure
Tracking methods and exposure mechanisms set AAAU and DGL apart. AAAU closely tracks the market price of physical gold by holding the metal in a vault, offering a transparent and direct link to gold's value. In contrast, DGL tracks an index of gold futures contracts, offering exposure to gold price movements through derivatives. Investors should consider their risk preferences and investment objectives when choosing between the two tracking mechanisms.

## Conclusion
AAAU and DGL provide investors with unique pathways to participate in the precious metals market. While AAAU offers direct ownership of physical gold, DGL provides exposure through gold futures contracts. For a comprehensive understanding of their holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insights, ETF Insider presents itself as the ultimate tool. This user-friendly app empowers investors with in-depth information about these financial instruments and helps them make informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

"AAAU - Perth Mint Physical Gold ETF." Aberdeen Standard Investments. https://www.aberdeenstandard.com/en-us/us/institutional/capabilities/etfs/aaau-perth-mint-physical-gold-etf
"DGL - Invesco DB Gold Fund." Invesco. https://www.invesco.com/us/financial-products/etfs/product-detail?productId=DGL
"Understanding the Differences Between Physical Gold and Gold ETFs." The Balance. https://www.thebalance.com/physical-gold-vs-gold-etfs-4771121



[AAAU ETF issuer](https://www.trackinsight.com/)
[AAAU ETF official page](https://www.trackinsight.com/en/fund/AAAU)

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

AAAU & DGL provide investors with unique pathways. While AAAU offers direct ownership of physical gold, DGL provides exposure through gold futures contracts.

AAAU VS DGL: Sectors and Top Holdings

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of investment by providing diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive comparison between two prominent Precious Metals ETFs: [BAR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/bar) (GraniteShares Gold Trust) and [DGL](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/dgl) (Invesco DB Gold Fund). We will delve into various facets, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## BAR VS DGL: Overview
BAR and DGL are two ETFs that offer distinct strategies for investing in precious metals. While BAR focuses on tracking the price of gold, DGL provides exposure to a broader spectrum of precious metals by tracking an index of futures contracts. This divergence in approach leads to different risk and return profiles, which we will explore in the subsequent sections.

## BAR VS DGL: Sectors and Top Holdings
The BAR ETF concentrates solely on gold and is primarily invested in physical gold bullion. In contrast, DGL encompasses a range of precious metals, including gold, silver, aluminum, zinc, and copper, among others. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs is crucial for investors aiming to align their investment strategies with specific precious metals or diversification goals.


![BAR overlap BAR VS DGL](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## BAR VS DGL: Capitalization and Strategy
BAR boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the value of gold. DGL's strategy revolves around tracking an index composed of futures contracts for various precious metals. The variation in capitalization and strategy between these two ETFs introduces varying levels of risk and potential returns, necessitating careful consideration by prospective investors.

## BAR VS DGL: Tracking and Exposure
The tracking mechanisms employed by BAR and DGL differ significantly. BAR's objective is to mirror the daily movements in the price of gold through physical ownership of gold bullion. On the other hand, DGL's exposure encompasses futures contracts across multiple precious metals, reflecting changes in the underlying commodity prices. Comprehending these distinctions in tracking and exposure strategies is essential for investors seeking precise exposure to specific precious metals or a broader basket.

## Conclusion
BAR and DGL present investors with distinctive avenues to participate in the precious metals market. For those interested in gaining deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical facets, the ETF Insider serves as an invaluable resource. With its user-friendly app, it empowers users to explore comprehensive details about these ETFs and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

GraniteShares. "GraniteShares Gold Trust." https://www.graniteshares.com/institutional/us/en-us/etf/bar-fund
Invesco. "Invesco DB Gold Fund." https://www.invesco.com/us/financial-products/etfs/product-detail?audienceType=Investor&ticker=DGL



[BAR ETF issuer](https://finance.yahoo.com/)
[BAR ETF official page](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/BAR/)

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

We will conduct a comprehensive comparison between two prominent Precious Metals ETFs: BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) and DGL (Invesco DB Gold Fund).

BAR VS DGL: Capitalization and Strategy

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have emerged as an essential tool for modern investors seeking exposure to various asset classes. In this article, we'll conduct an in-depth analysis of two distinct ETFs: [DUST](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/dust) (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares) and PHYG (iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF). We'll explore a range of topics, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## DUST VS PHYG: Overview
DUST and PHYG cater to different segments of the investment landscape. DUST aims to provide inverse exposure to gold mining companies, effectively magnifying the inverse performance of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index. PHYG, on the other hand, targets short-term, high-yield corporate bonds. These ETFs offer contrasting strategies and risk profiles, which we'll delve into further.

## DUST VS PHYG: Sectors and Top Holdings
The sectors targeted by DUST and PHYG are vastly different. DUST zeroes in on the gold mining sector, with holdings in companies like Newmont Corporation and Barrick Gold. PHYG, on the other hand, focuses on high-yield corporate bonds, including issuers like Sprint Capital Corporation and Tenet Healthcare Corporation. Understanding these sectors and holdings is crucial for investors aiming to align their portfolios with specific market segments.


![DUST overlap DUST VS PHYG](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## DUST VS PHYG: Capitalization and Strategy
When comparing the capitalization and strategy of DUST and PHYG, we see notable distinctions. DUST leverages a bearish approach to capitalize on declining performance within the gold mining industry, while PHYG seeks to generate returns through high-yield corporate bonds with maturities of five years or less. The varying capitalization and strategies of these ETFs offer investors opportunities for diversification and tailored risk exposure.

## DUST VS PHYG: Tracking and Exposure
DUST and PHYG differ in their tracking methodologies and exposure. DUST's goal is to provide double inverse daily performance relative to the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, making it a suitable option for investors who anticipate a decline in the gold mining sector. On the other hand, PHYG tracks a market-weighted index of US dollar-denominated, high-yield corporate bonds with maturities between one and five years. Understanding these tracking mechanisms is crucial for selecting the ETF that aligns with an investor's outlook.

## Conclusion
DUST and PHYG exemplify the diverse range of ETFs available to investors, each catering to specific investment strategies and risk appetites. For those seeking detailed insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other essential information, ETF Insider offers a comprehensive platform. Through its user-friendly app, investors can gain deeper insights into these ETFs and other financial instruments, enabling informed decision-making.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:



[DUST ETF issuer](https://finance.yahoo.com/)
[DUST ETF issuer](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/DUST/)

#### DUST quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [DUST](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/dust) [Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bear 2x Shares](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/dust), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

DUST and PHYG exemplify the diverse range of ETFs available to investors, each catering to specific investment strategies and risk appetites.

DUST VS PHYG: Tracking and Exposure

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of investing, providing investors with diverse exposure to different sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [NUGT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/nugt) (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X Shares) and PHYG (iShares Treasury/Credit Bond ETF). We'll explore various aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## NUGT VS PHYG: Overview
NUGT and PHYG are two ETFs that cater to distinct investment strategies within the financial market. While NUGT seeks to provide leveraged exposure to gold mining stocks, PHYG is focused on a blend of Treasury and investment-grade corporate bonds. This difference in investment objectives leads to varying risk and return profiles, which we'll delve into further.

## NUGT VS PHYG: Sectors and Top Holdings
The NUGT ETF predominantly invests in the stocks of gold mining companies, such as Newmont Corporation, Barrick Gold, and Kinross Gold. In contrast, PHYG is comprised of a mix of Treasury and investment-grade corporate bonds issued by entities like Apple Inc., Microsoft Corporation, and the U.S. Treasury. Understanding the sectors and top holdings is essential for investors aiming to align their portfolio with their desired risk exposure and potential returns.


![NUGT overlap NUGT VS PHYG](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## NUGT VS PHYG: Capitalization and Strategy
NUGT exhibits a significant asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking leveraged exposure to the gold mining sector. The ETF's strategy revolves around amplifying the daily performance of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index. On the other hand, PHYG's investment strategy focuses on providing income by tracking a broad index of Treasury and credit bonds. The varying capitalization and strategies of these ETFs necessitate careful consideration of risk tolerance and investment goals.

## NUGT VS PHYG: Tracking and Exposure
NUGT employs leverage to provide double the daily returns of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index. As such, its exposure is amplified, which can lead to higher returns but also higher risk. On the other hand, PHYG aims to replicate the performance of the ICE BofA US Corporate and Government Index, which includes both government and investment-grade corporate bonds. The tracking methods and exposure of these ETFs highlight the importance of understanding how leverage and fixed-income instruments impact investment outcomes.

## Conclusion
NUGT and PHYG are distinct ETFs that cater to different investment strategies within the financial market. Investors seeking to gain insights into these ETFs' holdings, correlations, overlaps, and various other details can benefit from using ETF Insider—an intuitive app that provides extensive information on these financial instruments. Whether you are considering leveraged exposure to gold mining stocks or a blend of Treasury and credit bonds, ETF Insider empowers you to make informed investment decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not offer investment advisory services.

Sources:

Direxion: "NUGT - Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X Shares"
iShares: "PHYG - iShares Treasury/Credit Bond ETF"
New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
ICE BofA Indices



[NUGT ETF issuer](https://finance.yahoo.com/)
[NUGT ETF issuer](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/NUGT/)

#### NUGT quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [NUGT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/nugt) [Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/nugt), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the NUGT and PHYG ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

NUGT VS PHYG

In the intricate realm of finance, where every move can make or break your investment portfolio, having a deep understanding of the available options is paramount. Two exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that often come into focus are [GLTR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/gltr) and PHYG. In this article, we will embark on a journey to comprehend the nuances that set these two funds apart and help you make more informed investment decisions.

## GLTR VS PHYG: Sectors and Top Holdings
When considering any investment vehicle, one of the first aspects to scrutinize is the sectors and top holdings. In the case of GLTR (SPDR Gold Trust) and PHYG (iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF), the contrast is stark.
GLTR is your ticket to the glittering world of gold. It's designed to track the performance of gold bullion, making it a favorite among investors seeking a hedge against inflation or currency fluctuations. Its top holding is, unsurprisingly, gold itself, with significant allocations to various forms of the precious metal.
In contrast, PHYG ventures into the realm of high-yield bonds. This ETF aims to provide exposure to U.S. high-yield corporate bonds while mitigating the impact of rising interest rates. Its top holdings are a mix of corporate bonds, reflecting its focus on income generation.

![GLTR overlap GLTR VS PHYG](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## GLTR VS PHYG: Capitalization Strategy
Capitalization strategy plays a pivotal role in the performance and risk profile of an ETF.
GLTR focuses on tracking the performance of physical gold. This means that its capitalization strategy revolves around the value of gold, which can fluctuate based on various macroeconomic factors. It's a strategy that attracts investors looking for a store of value and a hedge against economic uncertainty.
PHYG employs a unique approach by hedging its exposure to interest rates. This strategy aims to reduce the sensitivity of the fund's performance to changes in interest rates. It's a capitalization strategy suited for those who seek stability in a high-yield bond portfolio.

## GLTR VS PHYG: Tracking and Exposure
Tracking and exposure are crucial factors that determine how closely an ETF follows its benchmark index and what risks it might face.
GLTR is known for its impressive tracking of the price of gold. It offers investors a straightforward way to gain exposure to the fluctuations in the gold market. However, it's important to remember that gold prices can be volatile, making GLTR an investment choice that requires a long-term perspective.
PHYG seeks to provide exposure to high-yield bonds while reducing interest rate risk through hedging. This strategy aims to provide investors with a smoother ride, particularly during periods of rising interest rates. However, the effectiveness of the hedging strategy can vary depending on the interest rate environment.

## Conclusion
In the end, the choice between GLTR and PHYG boils down to your investment objectives and risk tolerance. GLTR offers a direct path to the world of gold, providing a hedge against economic uncertainty, while PHYG seeks to balance high-yield bond exposure with interest rate risk mitigation. Both ETFs have their merits and potential drawbacks, so it's crucial to align your investment choices with your financial goals.
Before making any investment decisions, it's wise to consult with a financial advisor who can provide personalized guidance based on your unique circumstances. Keep in mind that the financial landscape is ever-changing, and what may be a sound investment today could require adjustments tomorrow.
By delving into the nuances of GLTR and PHYG, you've taken an important step towards a more informed investment journey. Remember that a diversified portfolio often leads to better risk management, so consider how these ETFs fit into your broader financial strategy.

[GLTR ETF issuer](https://www.abrdn.com/en-us)
[GLTR ETF official page](https://www.abrdn.com/en-us/us/investor/fund-details/aberdeen-standard-physical-precious-metals-basket-shares-etf/share/us0032631006)

#### GLTR quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [GLTR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/gltr) [abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/gltr), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the GLTR and PHYG ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

GLTR VS PHYG

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have reshaped the landscape of modern investing, offering a convenient way to access a diverse range of asset classes and sectors. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive analysis of two prominent ETFs: FKRCX (Fidelity® Total Market Index Fund) and PHYG (iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF). This analysis will cover key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## FKRCX VS PHYG: Overview
FKRCX and PHYG are two distinct ETFs that cater to different investment strategies. FKRCX seeks to replicate the performance of the total U.S. stock market, providing investors with broad exposure to domestic equities. PHYG, on the other hand, aims to deliver returns that correspond to the performance of a hedged index of U.S. dollar-denominated, high-yield corporate bonds. Let's delve deeper into these ETFs to understand their nuances and potential benefits.

## FKRCX VS PHYG: Sectors and Top Holdings
FKRCX primarily invests in a diversified portfolio of U.S. stocks, covering various sectors including technology, healthcare, finance, and more. On the other hand, PHYG focuses on the high-yield corporate bond market, with holdings spanning companies from industries such as energy, telecommunications, and consumer discretionary. Analyzing the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs enables investors to grasp their exposure and potential risks.


![FKRCX overlap FKRCX VS PHYG](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## FKRCX VS PHYG: Capitalization and Strategy
The Fidelity® Total Market Index Fund boasts a substantial asset under management, reflecting its popularity among investors seeking broad equity exposure. PHYG's strategy involves investing in high-yield corporate bonds while using interest rate swaps to hedge against fluctuations in interest rates. The differences in capitalization and strategy between these two ETFs contribute to their unique risk-reward profiles, warranting careful consideration from investors.

## FKRCX VS PHYG: Tracking and Exposure
FKRCX tracks the performance of the total U.S. stock market, providing investors with a benchmark for domestic equity returns. PHYG, being a high-yield bond ETF, offers exposure to the performance of the underlying high-yield corporate bonds while employing interest rate hedges to mitigate interest rate risk. Understanding the tracking mechanisms and exposure of these ETFs is crucial for investors to align their portfolios with their investment objectives.

## Conclusion
FKRCX and PHYG offer investors distinct pathways to achieve their financial goals through diversified exposure to equities and fixed-income securities, respectively. To gain a deeper understanding of the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insightful metrics, investors can turn to ETF Insider—an intuitive and user-friendly application. ETF Insider equips investors with the tools to navigate the complexities of these financial instruments and make informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:






:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the FKRCX and PHYG ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

FKRCX VS PHYG

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of investment by providing diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: [GOEX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/goex) (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) and PHYG (Physically Backed Gold ETF). We'll delve into essential aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## GOEX vs PHYG: Overview
GOEX and PHYG are two distinct ETFs with different focuses within the gold industry. GOEX concentrates on gold exploration and mining companies, whereas PHYG provides direct exposure to physical gold. This divergence in strategy leads to varying risk profiles and potential returns, which we will scrutinize in the upcoming sections.

## GOEX vs PHYG: Sectors and Top Holdings
GOEX primarily invests in companies that explore, develop, and mine for gold. Its top holdings include prominent names like Kirkland Lake Gold, Newmont Corporation, and Franco-Nevada. On the other hand, PHYG invests in physical gold, with its holdings directly tied to the value of this precious metal. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs helps investors align their investment goals with the appropriate choice.


![GOEX overlap GOEX VS PHYG](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)


## GOEX vs PHYG: Capitalization and Strategy
GOEX's asset under management (AUM) reflects its popularity among investors interested in the potential growth of gold exploration companies. PHYG's strategy revolves around tracking the price of physical gold, providing a more direct exposure to changes in gold prices. The differences in capitalization and strategy between GOEX and PHYG result in distinct risk and return profiles, requiring careful consideration from potential investors.

## GOEX vs PHYG: Tracking and Exposure
GOEX aims to provide investors with exposure to the performance of companies engaged in gold exploration and mining activities. On the other hand, PHYG's tracking mechanism is tied directly to the price movements of physical gold. Understanding the nuances of tracking and exposure in these ETFs helps investors tailor their portfolios to their desired level of risk and potential returns.

<
h2>Conclusion</h2>GOEX and PHYG offer unique investment opportunities within the gold industry, catering to different investor preferences and risk appetites. For those seeking a deeper understanding of holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other crucial insights, the ETF Insider app proves to be an invaluable resource. With its user-friendly interface, the app equips investors with comprehensive information about these ETFs and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide any form of investment advisory services.

Sources:




[GOEX ETF issuer](https://www.globalxetfs.com/)
[GOEX ETF official page](https://www.globalxetfs.com/funds/goex/)

#### GOEX quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [GOEX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/goex) [Global X Gold Explorers ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/goex), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the GOEX and PHYG ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

GOEX VS PHYG

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become a cornerstone of modern investment strategies, offering exposure to a wide range of assets. In this article, we will embark on a comprehensive comparison between two notable Precious Metals ETFs: GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) and PHYG (iShares Physical Gold ETF). We'll delve into various aspects, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## GLL vs. PHYG: Overview
GLL and PHYG are two Precious Metals ETFs that cater to different investment objectives within the realm of precious metals. While GLL seeks to provide inverse exposure to the daily performance of gold, PHYG offers direct exposure to physical gold bullion. This divergence in focus results in distinct risk and return profiles, which we will dissect in the subsequent sections.

## GLL vs. PHYG: Sectors and Top Holdings
The GLL ETF operates with the intention of delivering twice the inverse daily performance of gold bullion. In contrast, PHYG owns and holds physical gold, providing investors with a direct and tangible link to the precious metal's value. Understanding the sectors and top holdings is pivotal for investors to align their portfolio with their investment goals and preferences.


![GLL overlap GLL VS PHYG](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)



## GLL vs. PHYG: Capitalization and Strategy
The ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) ETF boasts a noteworthy asset under management (AUM), reflective of its popularity among investors who seek to capitalize on declining gold prices. On the other hand, the iShares Physical Gold ETF (PHYG) focuses on the strategy of owning and storing gold bullion to track the precious metal's value. The disparity in capitalization and strategy introduces distinct opportunities and risks for investors to consider.

## GLL vs. PHYG: Tracking and Exposure
GLL's primary objective is to offer investors inverse exposure to the daily price movements of gold bullion. This means that as the price of gold declines, GLL aims to increase in value. PHYG, on the other hand, tracks the physical gold price itself, giving investors a direct link to the precious metal's performance. The differing tracking and exposure methods necessitate a thorough understanding of the investment approach that aligns with individual investment goals.

## Conclusion
GLL and PHYG exemplify two distinct approaches to investing in precious metals. Whether one seeks to hedge against gold price declines or own physical gold for long-term preservation, these ETFs cater to a variety of investor preferences. For those who wish to explore deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other financial instruments, ETF Insider stands as the ultimate tool. With its user-friendly app, it empowers investors to gain comprehensive insights and make informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not offer any investment advisory services.

Sources:

ProShares: https://www.proshares.com/funds/gll.html
iShares: https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239853/ishares-physical-gold-etf



[GLL ETF issuer](https://etfdb.com/)
[GLL ETF official page](https://etfdb.com/etf/GLL/)

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the GLL and PHYG ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies.

ETF Comparisons