
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have reshaped the investment landscape, offering a diverse range of opportunities across sectors and asset classes. In this article, we'll conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [DIA](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/dia) (SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) and [IVV](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ivv) (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF). We'll explore various aspects such as their tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## DIA VS IVV: Overview
DIA and IVV represent two distinct approaches to investment within the stock market. DIA tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average, a collection of 30 major U.S. companies, while IVV seeks to mirror the performance of the S&P 500 Index, encompassing 500 large-cap U.S. stocks. This distinction in focus gives rise to differing risk and return characteristics, which we'll delve into further.

## DIA VS IVV: Sectors and Top Holdings
The DIA ETF concentrates on a diverse range of sectors due to its inclusion of 30 significant companies. In contrast, IVV's holdings span across the broader spectrum of the U.S. economy, covering a more extensive set of industries. Understanding the sectors and top holdings within these ETFs can aid investors in aligning their investment choices with specific industry exposures.

![DIA overlap DIA VS IVV: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## DIA VS IVV: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
DIA boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the 30 blue-chip companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. IVV, on the other hand, offers a strategy focused on mirroring the performance of the broader S&P 500 Index, capturing the essence of the U.S. large-cap equity market. The differences in capitalization and investment strategy influence the potential for returns and risk within these ETFs.

## DIA VS IVV: Tracking Methods and Exposure
DIA's objective is to mimic the price and performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which comprises companies from various sectors. IVV, as an ETF tracking the S&P 500 Index, provides investors with exposure to a wide array of industries that collectively reflect the U.S. stock market's health. Understanding the tracking methodologies and exposure strategies of these ETFs can assist investors in crafting a well-balanced portfolio.

## Conclusion
DIA and IVV offer distinctive investment opportunities tailored to specific preferences. For investors seeking in-depth insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical information, ETF Insider serves as a valuable resource. With its user-friendly app, ETF Insider empowers investors with comprehensive data on these and various other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:


[DIA ETF issuer](https://finance.yahoo.com/)
[DIA ETF official page](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/DIA/)

#### IVV quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [IVV](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ivv) [iShares Core S&P 500 ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ivv), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

We'll conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: DIA (SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF).

DIA VS IVV: Tracking Methods & Exposure


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape by offering diversified exposure to various sectors and markets. This article delves into a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: [QQQ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/qqq) (Invesco QQQ Trust) and [DIA](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/dia) (SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF). We'll analyze their tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategies, tracking methods, and exposure.

## QQQ VS DIA: Overview
QQQ and DIA represent two distinct investment approaches within the ETF universe. While QQQ seeks to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index, composed of 100 non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market, DIA aims to mirror the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which comprises 30 large-cap U.S. stocks. This divergence in index selection leads to differing risk profiles and potential returns.

## QQQ VS DIA: Sectors and Top Holdings
QQQ's focus lies within the technology sector, with major holdings in companies like Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet. DIA, on the other hand, offers exposure to a broader range of sectors, including industrials, information technology, and healthcare, with top holdings such as Apple, Microsoft, and Boeing. Understanding the sectors and holdings can aid investors in aligning their ETF choices with specific sector preferences.

![QQQ overlap QQQ VS DIA: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## QQQ VS DIA: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
QQQ boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM) due to its popularity among investors seeking tech sector exposure. DIA, representing the 30 most prominent U.S. companies, offers a different investment strategy by capturing the performance of these established industry leaders. The contrast in capitalization and investment strategy influences risk and return potential, requiring careful consideration.

## QQQ VS DIA: Tracking Methods and Exposure
QQQ's objective is to closely follow the NASDAQ-100 Index by holding the stocks comprising it. This results in a tech-heavy portfolio with considerable growth potential but also heightened volatility. DIA employs a price-weighted approach to mirror the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which provides insight into the overall health of the U.S. economy. The tracking methods and exposure of these ETFs impact their performance and suitability for various investment goals.

## Conclusion
QQQ and DIA represent diverse investment opportunities, each catering to distinct market segments. For those seeking in-depth insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and more, ETF insider provides a valuable tool. This user-friendly app empowers investors with detailed information about these and other financial instruments, aiding informed decision-making.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to offer investment advisory services.

Sources:


[QQQ ETF issuer](https://www.invesco.com/)
[QQQ ETF official page](https://www.invesco.com/qqq-etf/en/home.html)

#### QQQ quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [QQQ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/qqq) [Invesco QQQ Trust](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/qqq), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

QQQ VS DIA are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

QQQ VS DIA: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have revolutionized the investment landscape, offering investors diversified exposure to various segments of the market. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: [SPY](lhttps://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/spy) (SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust) and [DIA](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/dia) (SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust). We'll explore key aspects including tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## SPY VS DIA: Overview
[SPY](lhttps://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/spy) and DIA are both heavyweight ETFs that provide exposure to different indices representing distinct segments of the U.S. equity market. [SPY](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/spy) aims to track the performance of the S&P 500 Index, encompassing 500 large-cap U.S. stocks. DIA, on the other hand, seeks to mirror the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index, which consists of 30 large-cap industrial companies. The differences in their underlying indices lead to varying investment outcomes, making a thorough comparison essential.

## SPY VS DIA: Sectors and Top Holdings
The [SPY](lhttps://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/spy) ETF encompasses a broad range of sectors, including technology, healthcare, finance, and consumer goods, reflecting the diversity of the S&P 500 Index. In contrast, DIA's focus is on industrial companies, offering exposure to sectors such as aerospace, manufacturing, and transportation. Diving into the sectors and top holdings of each ETF enables investors to gauge their alignment with market trends and sector preferences.

![SPY overlap SPY VS DIA: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## SPY VS DIA: Capitalization and Strategy
SPY boasts substantial assets under management (AUM), positioning itself as one of the largest and most liquid ETFs globally. Its strategy of tracking the S&P 500 Index provides investors with a comprehensive view of the overall U.S. equity market. DIA's strategy emphasizes the performance of 30 major industrial companies, giving it a unique profile compared to broader market ETFs. Evaluating their capitalization and strategy assists investors in understanding potential risks and returns.

## SPY VS DIA: Tracking and Exposure
SPY's tracking is geared towards mirroring the performance of the S&P 500 Index, which is weighted by market capitalization. This strategy offers exposure to the large-cap segment of the U.S. market. DIA, however, tracks the price-weighted Dow Jones Industrial Average Index, giving higher-priced stocks greater influence. This difference in tracking methodologies impacts their respective exposures and performance dynamics. Understanding these nuances helps investors choose the ETF that aligns with their investment objectives.

## Conclusion
[SPY](lhttps://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/spy) and DIA are two significant ETFs that cater to different segments of the U.S. equity market. Investors seeking detailed insights into their holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other factors can benefit from utilizing ETF insider, an intuitive app that provides extensive information on various financial instruments. Whether one's focus is on broad market exposure or specific industrial sectors, these ETFs offer unique avenues for building a diversified investment portfolio.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

[SPY ETF issuer](https://www.ssga.com/)
[SPY ETF official page](https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs/funds/spdr-sp-500-etf-trust-spy)

#### SPY quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [SPY](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/spy) [SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/spy), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

SPY VS DIA are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

SPY VS DIA: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) play a crucial role in modern investment strategies, offering diversified exposure to various market segments and sectors. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two notable ETFs: EWAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF) and FAUS (First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund). We'll explore key aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## EWAS VS FAUS: Overview
EWAS and FAUS represent distinct investment approaches within the realm of international equities. While EWAS focuses on providing exposure to high-dividend-yielding companies across developed markets, FAUS employs an innovative stock selection methodology in the Australian equity space. Understanding these differing strategies is essential for investors looking to allocate their funds effectively.

## EWAS VS FAUS: Sectors and Top Holdings
EWAS's portfolio is designed to capture the performance of companies with attractive dividend yields in developed markets outside the United States. In contrast, FAUS utilizes the AlphaDEX methodology to select and weight stocks within the Australian equity universe based on growth and value factors. Examining the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs can help investors evaluate their potential for generating income and capital appreciation.

![EWAS overlap EWAS VS FAUS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## EWAS VS FAUS: Capitalization and Strategy
EWAS boasts a considerable asset under management (AUM), reflecting its appeal to income-seeking investors. The ETF's strategy involves identifying companies with strong dividend potential in international markets. FAUS, on the other hand, applies a unique stock selection process to construct a portfolio of Australian companies with growth and value characteristics. Analyzing the capitalization and strategy of these ETFs assists investors in aligning their investment objectives with the appropriate fund.

## EWAS VS FAUS: Tracking and Exposure
EWAS seeks to replicate the performance of the MSCI EAFE Dividend Masters Select Index, which comprises companies with a history of consistent dividend payments. FAUS tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Australia Index, a factor-based index that aims to outperform traditional market-cap-weighted indices through its stock selection process. Understanding the tracking methodology and exposure of these ETFs enables investors to make informed decisions based on their desired risk and return profiles.

## Conclusion
EWAS and FAUS offer distinct investment opportunities within the international equity landscape, catering to investors with diverse goals and preferences. For those seeking a deeper understanding of the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insights, utilizing tools like ETF insider can be invaluable. This user-friendly app provides comprehensive information about these and other financial instruments, aiding investors in making well-informed choices.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:




:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

EWAS VS faus are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

EWAS VS FAUS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the way investors approach financial markets, providing convenient access to diverse sectors and assets. In this comprehensive article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: AUSE (Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF) and FAUS (First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund). We'll cover crucial aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## AUSE VS FAUS: Overview
AUSE and FAUS are distinct ETFs that cater to different investment strategies and geographic regions. AUSE focuses on offering exposure to physical gold, while FAUS is designed to track an index of fundamentally selected Australian companies. This fundamental difference influences the ETFs' performance, risk profile, and potential returns, aspects that we will explore further in the subsequent sections.

## AUSE VS FAUS: Sectors and Top Holdings
AUSE primarily invests in physical gold and holds gold bullion as its primary asset. On the other hand, FAUS is concentrated in Australian equities, including companies like CSL Ltd, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, and Westpac Banking Corp. Examining the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs is essential for investors to align their investments with their financial goals and risk tolerance.

![AUSE overlap AUSE VS FAUS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## AUSE VS FAUS: Capitalization and Strategy
AUSE has a significant asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the value of gold. FAUS employs the AlphaDEX methodology to select and weight Australian stocks based on fundamental factors. This strategy aims to outperform traditional market-cap-weighted indices. The differences in capitalization and investment strategy between AUSE and FAUS can lead to varying performance trajectories and risk levels, demanding careful consideration from potential investors.

## AUSE VS FAUS: Tracking Methods and Exposure
The AUSE ETF's primary goal is to mirror the performance of physical gold prices. In contrast, FAUS tracks the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Australia Index, composed of Australian companies with favorable fundamental attributes. AUSE's tracking method relies on the price of gold, while FAUS uses a proprietary selection process for its underlying index. Understanding these tracking methods and exposure dynamics is crucial for investors to make informed decisions based on their investment preferences.

## Conclusion
AUSE and FAUS offer unique investment opportunities catering to different objectives and regions. For investors seeking more detailed insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other nuances, ETF Insider provides a comprehensive toolset. With its user-friendly application, investors can gain valuable insights into these ETFs and other financial instruments, aiding in making well-informed investment choices.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF (AUSE) Fact Sheet
First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund (FAUS) Overview




:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

We'll cover crucial aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

AUSE VS FAUS: A Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have significantly transformed the investment landscape, providing investors with diverse exposure across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: AUSE (Aberdeen Standard Australian Equities ETF) and EWAS (iShares MSCI Australia [ESG](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/esg) Aware ETF). Our analysis will cover key aspects such as ticker symbols, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methodologies, and exposure characteristics.

## AUSE VS EWAS: Overview
AUSE and EWAS are two distinct ETFs that cater to different investment preferences within the Australian equities market. While AUSE focuses on providing exposure to Australian equities broadly, EWAS incorporates environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into its investment approach. This fundamental difference in approach shapes their respective investment outcomes and risk profiles.

## AUSE VS EWAS: Sectors and Top Holdings
The AUSE ETF offers exposure to a range of sectors within the Australian equity market, including financials, materials, and healthcare. Conversely, EWAS integrates ESG criteria into its investment selection process, favoring companies with strong ESG practices. As a result, EWAS's top holdings may differ from traditional market-weighted indexes, reflecting its ESG-conscious approach.

![AUSE overlap AUSE VS EWAS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## AUSE VS EWAS: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
With its larger asset under management (AUM), AUSE represents a broader exposure to the Australian equities market. Its investment strategy revolves around tracking a market index, allowing investors to gain diversified exposure to Australian companies. On the other hand, EWAS's strategy aligns with ESG principles, aiming to provide investors with exposure to Australian companies that meet specific ESG criteria.

## AUSE VS EWAS: Tracking Methodologies and Exposure
AUSE seeks to replicate the performance of a market index composed of Australian equities. Its tracking methodology involves holding a portfolio of securities that mirrors the composition of the index. In contrast, EWAS focuses on Australian companies with favorable ESG attributes, aiming to align investments with sustainability goals. Understanding these tracking methodologies and exposure characteristics helps investors select the ETF that aligns with their investment objectives.

## Conclusion
AUSE and EWAS are distinctive ETFs designed to cater to different investor preferences and strategies within the Australian equities market. For investors seeking comprehensive insights into the holdings, investment correlations, and exposure nuances of these ETFs, tools like ETF insider offer valuable resources. This user-friendly app provides detailed information about these financial instruments and others, empowering investors to make informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide any form of investment advisory services.

Sources:




:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

AUSE and EWAS are distinctive ETFs designed to cater to different investor preferences and strategies within the Australian equities market.

AUSE VS EWAS: A Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, offering investors diverse exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [EWA](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa) (iShares MSCI Australia ETF) and FAUS (First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund). We'll explore key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## EWA VS FAUS: Overview
EWA and FAUS are two ETFs that offer distinct investment strategies centered around the Australian market. While EWA aims to track the performance of the MSCI Australia Index, FAUS employs a unique approach by using the AlphaDEX methodology to select and weight stocks from the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Australia Index. These differing strategies result in varying exposures and potential returns, which we will delve into further in the subsequent sections.

## EWA VS FAUS: Sectors and Top Holdings
The EWA ETF provides exposure to a broad range of sectors within the Australian equity market, including financials, materials, and healthcare. Its top holdings include companies like CSL Ltd, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, and BHP Group. FAUS, on the other hand, employs a factor-based strategy to select stocks with potentially higher returns, and its top holdings encompass stocks like Reece Ltd, Appen Ltd, and IPH Ltd. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of each ETF aids investors in aligning their investment objectives with the ETF that suits their preferences.

![EWA overlap EWA VS FAUS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## EWA VS FAUS: Capitalization and Strategy
EWA boasts a considerable Asset Under Management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the Australian equity market. Its strategy involves tracking the MSCI Australia Index, aiming to mirror the performance of the broader Australian market. FAUS employs a different approach by utilizing a rules-based methodology that considers growth and value factors to select and weight stocks. This strategy introduces a potential for enhanced returns but also entails specific risks associated with factor-based investing.

## EWA VS FAUS: Tracking and Exposure
EWA seeks to closely replicate the performance of the MSCI Australia Index, providing investors with exposure to the Australian equity market's overall movements. FAUS, with its AlphaDEX methodology, aims to outperform traditional market-cap-weighted indices by selecting stocks based on specific factors and characteristics. These distinct tracking and exposure strategies enable investors to tailor their portfolios to their risk tolerance and investment goals.

## Conclusion
EWA and FAUS represent two unique approaches to investing in the Australian equity market. For investors seeking a comprehensive understanding of the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other valuable insights, ETF insider serves as an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, ETF insider empowers investors with detailed information on these ETFs and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA) official website
First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund (FAUS) official website


[EWA ETF issuer](https://www.ishares.com/)
[EWA ETF official page](https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239607/ishares-msci-australia-etf)

#### EWA quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [EWA](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa) [iShares MSCI Australia ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

EWA VS faus are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

EWA VS FAUS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have introduced a new level of versatility by enabling diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [EWA](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa) (iShares MSCI Australia ETF) and AUSE (WisdomTree Australia Dividend Fund). Our exploration will encompass critical aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## EWA VS AUSE: Overview
EWA and AUSE stand as two distinct ETFs, each presenting a unique investment approach within the Australian market. EWA tracks the MSCI Australia Index and offers broad exposure to the Australian equity market, while AUSE, managed by WisdomTree, concentrates on dividend-paying companies in Australia. The contrast in investment focus yields varying risk profiles and potential rewards, a theme we will delve into further.

## EWA VS AUSE: Sectors and Top Holdings
EWA primarily invests in a diverse array of Australian companies across multiple sectors, including financials, materials, and healthcare. On the other hand, AUSE focuses on companies with robust dividend yields, such as Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Westpac Banking Corporation, and BHP Group. The differentiation in sectors and top holdings between these two ETFs plays a pivotal role in shaping their performance trajectories.

![EWA overlap EWA VS AUSE: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## EWA VS AUSE: Capitalization and Strategy
EWA boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicative of its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the Australian equity market. AUSE, driven by its dividend strategy, strives to provide investors with a steady stream of income. The variance in capitalization and strategy introduces distinct investment dynamics, underscoring the necessity for thorough consideration by potential investors.

## EWA VS AUSE: Tracking and Exposure
EWA aims to mirror the performance of the MSCI Australia Index, capturing the overall movements of the Australian equity market. In contrast, AUSE concentrates on dividend-paying stocks, and its underlying index methodology takes dividend yield into account when selecting its components. Divergent tracking and exposure methodologies enable investors to tailor their portfolio choices according to their risk appetite and investment objectives.

## Conclusion
EWA and AUSE exemplify the diversity within the ETF landscape, offering investors specialized avenues to engage with the Australian market. For those who seek to gain deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other intricate details, ETF insider stands as an invaluable resource. With a user-friendly app, investors can access comprehensive information about these and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:


[EWA ETF issuer](https://www.ishares.com/)
[EWA ETF official page](https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239607/ishares-msci-australia-etf)

#### EWA quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [EWA](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa) [iShares MSCI Australia ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

EWA VS AUSE are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

EWA VS AUSE: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become integral tools for investors seeking diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a thorough comparison between two prominent ETFs: CNDA (iShares MSCI Canada ETF) and [HEWC](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/hewc) (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Canada ETF). We will analyze crucial factors such as tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## CNDA VS HEWC: Overview
CNDA and HEWC are both ETFs that focus on Canadian equities. However, they differ in their approach due to currency hedging. While CNDA provides exposure to the Canadian stock market without currency hedging, HEWC aims to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar. This distinction in currency exposure is a key consideration for investors evaluating these ETFs.

## CNDA VS HEWC: Sectors and Top Holdings
The CNDA ETF offers broad exposure to various sectors within the Canadian equity market. Its top holdings often include well-established Canadian companies across industries such as finance, energy, and technology. On the other hand, HEWC's portfolio also encompasses these sectors, but its currency-hedged strategy can impact the performance of individual holdings based on currency movements.

![CNDA overlap CNDA VS HEWC: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## CNDA VS HEWC: Capitalization and Strategy
CNDA and HEWC have different capitalizations and strategies due to their currency exposure approaches. CNDA's asset under management (AUM) reflects its popularity as an unhedged Canadian equity ETF. HEWC, by employing currency hedging, seeks to mitigate the impact of exchange rate fluctuations between the Canadian and U.S. dollars. Investors should consider the trade-offs between currency protection and potential returns.

## CNDA VS HEWC: Tracking and Exposure
CNDA seeks to closely replicate the performance of the MSCI Canada Index, offering investors exposure to the overall Canadian equity market. HEWC, in addition to tracking the MSCI Canada Index, implements a currency-hedged strategy to reduce the influence of currency fluctuations on returns. Understanding the tracking methodologies and exposure dynamics is essential for investors to make informed decisions.

## Conclusion
CNDA and HEWC present distinct approaches to investing in the Canadian equity market, with CNDA offering unhedged exposure and HEWC providing currency-hedged exposure. As investors consider their preferences for currency risk and potential returns, tools like ETF insider can provide valuable insights into the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other essential information. With its user-friendly app, ETF insider empowers investors to navigate the complexities of these and other financial instruments effectively.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

iShares by BlackRock official websites for CNDA and HEWC
MSCI Canada Index methodology and constituent data




:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

CNDA and HEWC are both ETFs that focus on Canadian equities. However, they differ in their approach due to currency hedging. Read our article.

ETF Comparisons