BOTZ VS SMH
3 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

BOTZ VS SMH

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape by offering diversification across different sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF) and SMH (VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF). We'll delve into essential aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

BOTZ Vs SMH: Overview

BOTZ and SMH are two ETFs with distinct focuses. BOTZ aims to capture the growth potential of the robotics and artificial intelligence sector, while SMH targets companies in the semiconductor industry. This divergence in investment themes results in differing risk profiles and potential returns, which we'll explore in the subsequent sections.

BOTZ Vs SMH: Sectors and Top Holdings

BOTZ predominantly invests in companies engaged in robotics, automation, and AI technologies. Its top holdings include industry giants like Intuitive Surgical, NVIDIA, and ABB Ltd. In contrast, SMH invests in semiconductor manufacturers like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and Intel. Understanding the sectors and top holdings is crucial for investors seeking alignment with their investment goals.

BOTZ  overlap BOTZ VS SMHBOTZ overlap BOTZ VS SMH

BOTZ Vs SMH: Capitalization and Strategy

BOTZ has gained significant popularity, reflected in its substantial asset under management (AUM). The fund's strategy revolves around capturing the potential growth of robotics and AI technologies across various industries. On the other hand, SMH's strategy focuses on tracking the performance of semiconductor companies. The variance in capitalization and strategy underscores the importance of considering risk and potential returns.

BOTZ Vs SMH: Tracking and Exposure

BOTZ seeks to provide investors with exposure to the robotics and AI sector by investing in companies at the forefront of technological innovation. On the contrary, SMH aims to replicate the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, comprising leading semiconductor manufacturers. The different tracking methodologies offer distinct market exposures, influencing risk and reward dynamics.

Conclusion

BOTZ and SMH represent unique investment opportunities, each catering to specific themes within the technology sector. Investors seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical details can leverage the ETF Insider app. With its user-friendly interface, the app offers comprehensive information about these ETFs and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not offer investment advisory services.

Sources:

https://www.globalxetfs.com/ BOTZ ETF issuer
https://www.globalxetfs.com/funds/botz/ BOTZ ETF official page

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is BOTZ better than SMH?

    BOTZ may be considered better than SMH for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does SMH beat BOTZ?

    SMH's performance relative to BOTZ will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in BOTZ or SMH?

    The choice between BOTZ and SMH should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are BOTZ and SMH good investments?

    Both BOTZ and SMH can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between BOTZ and SMH?

    The correlation between BOTZ and SMH can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.