Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the way investors approach the financial markets, offering a convenient and diversified way to gain exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) and FDMO (Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF). We will explore a range of critical aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.
The DWAS and FDMO ETFs follow distinct investment strategies, primarily focusing on the momentum factor within the small-cap equity space. DWAS aims to capture the momentum of small-cap stocks with strong price trends, while FDMO seeks to provide exposure to companies with favorable momentum characteristics across various sectors. This fundamental difference in investment approach gives rise to unique exposures and potential risks, which we will delve into in the subsequent sections.
DWAS is designed to target companies with strong price momentum across various sectors, including technology, healthcare, and consumer discretionary. Some of its top holdings include stocks like Live Nation Entertainment, Match Group, and Enphase Energy. On the other hand, FDMO's portfolio comprises stocks with positive momentum across sectors such as consumer staples, financials, and industrials. Examining the sectors and top holdings provides valuable insights into the underlying focus of each ETF and aids investors in aligning their investment goals.
DWAS overlap DWAS VS FDMO
DWAS boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), signifying its popularity among investors interested in small-cap momentum investing. The ETF's investment strategy revolves around identifying companies with strong relative strength characteristics and capitalizing on their potential for continued outperformance. FDMO, too, emphasizes capturing momentum but across a broader market capitalization spectrum. Understanding the varying capitalization and strategy components helps investors gauge the risk-return profile of each ETF.
The DWAS ETF tracks an index that evaluates small-cap stocks based on price momentum, aiming to capture companies exhibiting strong upward price trends. Conversely, FDMO tracks an index comprised of companies across different sectors, seeking to capture momentum across a wider market segment. The distinction in tracking methods influences the ETFs' exposure to specific sectors and stocks, influencing their performance under varying market conditions.
DWAS and FDMO represent unique investment opportunities within the ETF landscape, catering to investors seeking to capitalize on momentum factors in different ways. For those keen on gaining deeper insights into the nuances of holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical information, ETF Insider emerges as the ultimate tool. With its user-friendly app, it empowers investors with comprehensive details about these and other financial instruments, facilitating informed decision-making.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide any form of investment advisory services.
Sources:
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) Fact Sheet. Invesco.
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) Overview. Fidelity Investments.
ETF Insider: Empowering Investors with Data-Driven Insights. [Website Link]
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF, access our dedicated page now.
DWAS may be considered better than FDMO for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.
FDMO's performance relative to DWAS will vary over time, depending on market conditions.
The choice between DWAS and FDMO should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.
Both DWAS and FDMO can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.
The correlation between DWAS and FDMO can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.