The cannabis industry is booming, and with its growth comes an increasing number of investment opportunities. One common way investors are diving into the cannabis market is through Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). Two prominent players in this space are MJ and CNBS. So, how do they stack up against each other?
MJ is the ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF, focusing on cannabis, hemp, and CBD sectors. CNBS, on the other hand, is the Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF, targeting companies in the legal cannabis, hemp, and CBD industries. Both aim to provide diversified exposure to this burgeoning sector, but the strategy behind each varies considerably.
ETFMG, or Exchange Traded Managers Group, is the issuer behind the Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ). Established in 2014, the company is known for pioneering thematic and unconventional ETFs.
Amplify ETFs is the issuer of CNBS. Amplify focuses on offering unique, problem-solving ETFs across a variety of asset classes. Their CNBS ETF stands as a testament to their innovative approach to market trends.
MJ overlap MJ VS CNBS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
MJ primarily targets the U.S. market, while CNBS has a broader, global scope. While both invest in companies involved in the cannabis industry, CNBS often includes companies involved in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, providing a broader reach.
When it comes to performance, both MJ and CNBS are highly volatile, reflective of the nascent cannabis industry. However, CNBS typically includes more established companies in its portfolio, possibly providing a less risky investment compared to MJ.
Both ETFs come with their own set of fees and expenses, which can eat into returns. MJ has a higher expense ratio compared to CNBS, which could be a significant factor for cost-sensitive investors.
Liquidity is a key factor when it comes to investing in any asset. Both MJ and CNBS are fairly liquid, but MJ, being one of the first cannabis-focused ETFs, tends to have higher liquidity. This could be advantageous for traders looking for quick entry and exit points.
The cannabis industry is fraught with regulatory challenges, making it crucial to understand how each ETF navigates these waters. CNBS takes a more conservative approach, focusing on companies that are fully compliant with local laws, while MJ is a bit more aggressive, investing in companies with broader, though riskier, market strategies.
If diversification is your goal, you might lean towards CNBS. Their holdings include a wider array of sub-sectors within the cannabis industry, from cultivation to biotech. MJ, however, offers less diversification, primarily focusing on cultivation and retail.
Both MJ and CNBS offer intriguing investment opportunities in the cannabis sector, each with its own set of advantages and drawbacks. Your choice between the two will ultimately depend on your investment goals, risk tolerance, and belief in the potential for growth in the cannabis industry.
With the cannabis sector poised for significant growth, either ETF could provide substantial returns. But like all investments, it's crucial to do your due diligence and understand the nuances that distinguish MJ from CNBS. Armed with this information, you can make an educated decision on which cannabis ETF is right for you.
MJ ETF issuer
MJ ETF official page
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF, access our dedicated page now.