
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) play a crucial role in modern investment strategies, offering diversified exposure to various market segments and sectors. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two notable ETFs: EWAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF) and FAUS (First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund). We'll explore key aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## EWAS VS FAUS: Overview
EWAS and FAUS represent distinct investment approaches within the realm of international equities. While EWAS focuses on providing exposure to high-dividend-yielding companies across developed markets, FAUS employs an innovative stock selection methodology in the Australian equity space. Understanding these differing strategies is essential for investors looking to allocate their funds effectively.

## EWAS VS FAUS: Sectors and Top Holdings
EWAS's portfolio is designed to capture the performance of companies with attractive dividend yields in developed markets outside the United States. In contrast, FAUS utilizes the AlphaDEX methodology to select and weight stocks within the Australian equity universe based on growth and value factors. Examining the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs can help investors evaluate their potential for generating income and capital appreciation.

![EWAS overlap EWAS VS FAUS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## EWAS VS FAUS: Capitalization and Strategy
EWAS boasts a considerable asset under management (AUM), reflecting its appeal to income-seeking investors. The ETF's strategy involves identifying companies with strong dividend potential in international markets. FAUS, on the other hand, applies a unique stock selection process to construct a portfolio of Australian companies with growth and value characteristics. Analyzing the capitalization and strategy of these ETFs assists investors in aligning their investment objectives with the appropriate fund.

## EWAS VS FAUS: Tracking and Exposure
EWAS seeks to replicate the performance of the MSCI EAFE Dividend Masters Select Index, which comprises companies with a history of consistent dividend payments. FAUS tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Australia Index, a factor-based index that aims to outperform traditional market-cap-weighted indices through its stock selection process. Understanding the tracking methodology and exposure of these ETFs enables investors to make informed decisions based on their desired risk and return profiles.

## Conclusion
EWAS and FAUS offer distinct investment opportunities within the international equity landscape, catering to investors with diverse goals and preferences. For those seeking a deeper understanding of the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insights, utilizing tools like ETF insider can be invaluable. This user-friendly app provides comprehensive information about these and other financial instruments, aiding investors in making well-informed choices.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:




:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

EWAS VS faus are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

EWAS VS FAUS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the way investors approach financial markets, providing convenient access to diverse sectors and assets. In this comprehensive article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: AUSE (Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF) and FAUS (First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund). We'll cover crucial aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## AUSE VS FAUS: Overview
AUSE and FAUS are distinct ETFs that cater to different investment strategies and geographic regions. AUSE focuses on offering exposure to physical gold, while FAUS is designed to track an index of fundamentally selected Australian companies. This fundamental difference influences the ETFs' performance, risk profile, and potential returns, aspects that we will explore further in the subsequent sections.

## AUSE VS FAUS: Sectors and Top Holdings
AUSE primarily invests in physical gold and holds gold bullion as its primary asset. On the other hand, FAUS is concentrated in Australian equities, including companies like CSL Ltd, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, and Westpac Banking Corp. Examining the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs is essential for investors to align their investments with their financial goals and risk tolerance.

![AUSE overlap AUSE VS FAUS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## AUSE VS FAUS: Capitalization and Strategy
AUSE has a significant asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the value of gold. FAUS employs the AlphaDEX methodology to select and weight Australian stocks based on fundamental factors. This strategy aims to outperform traditional market-cap-weighted indices. The differences in capitalization and investment strategy between AUSE and FAUS can lead to varying performance trajectories and risk levels, demanding careful consideration from potential investors.

## AUSE VS FAUS: Tracking Methods and Exposure
The AUSE ETF's primary goal is to mirror the performance of physical gold prices. In contrast, FAUS tracks the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Australia Index, composed of Australian companies with favorable fundamental attributes. AUSE's tracking method relies on the price of gold, while FAUS uses a proprietary selection process for its underlying index. Understanding these tracking methods and exposure dynamics is crucial for investors to make informed decisions based on their investment preferences.

## Conclusion
AUSE and FAUS offer unique investment opportunities catering to different objectives and regions. For investors seeking more detailed insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other nuances, ETF Insider provides a comprehensive toolset. With its user-friendly application, investors can gain valuable insights into these ETFs and other financial instruments, aiding in making well-informed investment choices.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF (AUSE) Fact Sheet
First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund (FAUS) Overview




:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

We'll cover crucial aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

AUSE VS FAUS: A Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have significantly transformed the investment landscape, providing investors with diverse exposure across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: AUSE (Aberdeen Standard Australian Equities ETF) and EWAS (iShares MSCI Australia [ESG](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/esg) Aware ETF). Our analysis will cover key aspects such as ticker symbols, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methodologies, and exposure characteristics.

## AUSE VS EWAS: Overview
AUSE and EWAS are two distinct ETFs that cater to different investment preferences within the Australian equities market. While AUSE focuses on providing exposure to Australian equities broadly, EWAS incorporates environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into its investment approach. This fundamental difference in approach shapes their respective investment outcomes and risk profiles.

## AUSE VS EWAS: Sectors and Top Holdings
The AUSE ETF offers exposure to a range of sectors within the Australian equity market, including financials, materials, and healthcare. Conversely, EWAS integrates ESG criteria into its investment selection process, favoring companies with strong ESG practices. As a result, EWAS's top holdings may differ from traditional market-weighted indexes, reflecting its ESG-conscious approach.

![AUSE overlap AUSE VS EWAS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## AUSE VS EWAS: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
With its larger asset under management (AUM), AUSE represents a broader exposure to the Australian equities market. Its investment strategy revolves around tracking a market index, allowing investors to gain diversified exposure to Australian companies. On the other hand, EWAS's strategy aligns with ESG principles, aiming to provide investors with exposure to Australian companies that meet specific ESG criteria.

## AUSE VS EWAS: Tracking Methodologies and Exposure
AUSE seeks to replicate the performance of a market index composed of Australian equities. Its tracking methodology involves holding a portfolio of securities that mirrors the composition of the index. In contrast, EWAS focuses on Australian companies with favorable ESG attributes, aiming to align investments with sustainability goals. Understanding these tracking methodologies and exposure characteristics helps investors select the ETF that aligns with their investment objectives.

## Conclusion
AUSE and EWAS are distinctive ETFs designed to cater to different investor preferences and strategies within the Australian equities market. For investors seeking comprehensive insights into the holdings, investment correlations, and exposure nuances of these ETFs, tools like ETF insider offer valuable resources. This user-friendly app provides detailed information about these financial instruments and others, empowering investors to make informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide any form of investment advisory services.

Sources:




:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

AUSE and EWAS are distinctive ETFs designed to cater to different investor preferences and strategies within the Australian equities market.

AUSE VS EWAS: A Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, offering investors diverse exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [EWA](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa) (iShares MSCI Australia ETF) and FAUS (First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund). We'll explore key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## EWA VS FAUS: Overview
EWA and FAUS are two ETFs that offer distinct investment strategies centered around the Australian market. While EWA aims to track the performance of the MSCI Australia Index, FAUS employs a unique approach by using the AlphaDEX methodology to select and weight stocks from the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Australia Index. These differing strategies result in varying exposures and potential returns, which we will delve into further in the subsequent sections.

## EWA VS FAUS: Sectors and Top Holdings
The EWA ETF provides exposure to a broad range of sectors within the Australian equity market, including financials, materials, and healthcare. Its top holdings include companies like CSL Ltd, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, and BHP Group. FAUS, on the other hand, employs a factor-based strategy to select stocks with potentially higher returns, and its top holdings encompass stocks like Reece Ltd, Appen Ltd, and IPH Ltd. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of each ETF aids investors in aligning their investment objectives with the ETF that suits their preferences.

![EWA overlap EWA VS FAUS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## EWA VS FAUS: Capitalization and Strategy
EWA boasts a considerable Asset Under Management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the Australian equity market. Its strategy involves tracking the MSCI Australia Index, aiming to mirror the performance of the broader Australian market. FAUS employs a different approach by utilizing a rules-based methodology that considers growth and value factors to select and weight stocks. This strategy introduces a potential for enhanced returns but also entails specific risks associated with factor-based investing.

## EWA VS FAUS: Tracking and Exposure
EWA seeks to closely replicate the performance of the MSCI Australia Index, providing investors with exposure to the Australian equity market's overall movements. FAUS, with its AlphaDEX methodology, aims to outperform traditional market-cap-weighted indices by selecting stocks based on specific factors and characteristics. These distinct tracking and exposure strategies enable investors to tailor their portfolios to their risk tolerance and investment goals.

## Conclusion
EWA and FAUS represent two unique approaches to investing in the Australian equity market. For investors seeking a comprehensive understanding of the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other valuable insights, ETF insider serves as an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, ETF insider empowers investors with detailed information on these ETFs and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA) official website
First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund (FAUS) official website


[EWA ETF issuer](https://www.ishares.com/)
[EWA ETF official page](https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239607/ishares-msci-australia-etf)

#### EWA quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [EWA](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa) [iShares MSCI Australia ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

EWA VS faus are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

EWA VS FAUS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of modern investing by providing diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [EWA](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa) (iShares MSCI Australia ETF) and EWAS (iShares MSCI Australia Small-Cap ETF). We'll delve into critical aspects, including their tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategies, tracking methodologies, and exposure profiles.

## EWA VS EWAS: Overview
EWA and EWAS are both ETFs that focus on providing exposure to the Australian equity market, but they differ in their scope. While EWA aims to track the performance of large and mid-cap Australian companies, EWAS concentrates on Australian small-cap stocks. This distinction in their investment approach results in distinct risk and return profiles, which we'll explore further in the subsequent sections.

## EWA VS EWAS: Sectors and Top Holdings
The iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA) primarily invests in sectors such as Financials, Materials, and Healthcare, with top holdings including companies like Commonwealth Bank of Australia and CSL Limited. On the other hand, the iShares MSCI Australia Small-Cap ETF (EWAS) focuses on smaller companies in sectors like Industrials and Consumer Discretionary, with holdings like Aristocrat Leisure and Appen Limited. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs is crucial for investors seeking exposure to specific industries.

![EWA overlap EWA VS EWAS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## EWA VS EWAS: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
EWA, with its larger asset under management (AUM), reflects its popularity among investors interested in Australia's established companies. EWAS, with its focus on small-cap stocks, targets companies with smaller market capitalization and higher growth potential. The investment strategies of these ETFs diverge due to their distinct capitalization preferences, resulting in varying risk and return characteristics.

## EWA VS EWAS: Tracking Methodology and Exposure
The iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA) tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia Index, providing exposure to the broader Australian equity market. Conversely, the iShares MSCI Australia Small-Cap ETF (EWAS) tracks the MSCI Australia Small Cap Index, concentrating on smaller companies. Investors considering these ETFs must evaluate their tracking methodologies and underlying index compositions to align their investment goals with the desired exposure.

## Conclusion
EWA and EWAS present investors with distinct avenues to access the Australian equity market, catering to different risk appetites and investment objectives. For a deeper understanding of their holdings, correlations, and other insightful data, utilizing tools like ETF insider can be invaluable. This user-friendly app empowers investors to explore these and other financial instruments comprehensively.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not offer investment advisory services.

Sources:


[EWA ETF issuer](https://www.ishares.com/)
[EWA ETF official page](https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239607/ishares-msci-australia-etf)

#### EWA quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [EWA](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa) [iShares MSCI Australia ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

EWA VS EWAS are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

EWA VS EWAS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have introduced a new level of versatility by enabling diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [EWA](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa) (iShares MSCI Australia ETF) and AUSE (WisdomTree Australia Dividend Fund). Our exploration will encompass critical aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## EWA VS AUSE: Overview
EWA and AUSE stand as two distinct ETFs, each presenting a unique investment approach within the Australian market. EWA tracks the MSCI Australia Index and offers broad exposure to the Australian equity market, while AUSE, managed by WisdomTree, concentrates on dividend-paying companies in Australia. The contrast in investment focus yields varying risk profiles and potential rewards, a theme we will delve into further.

## EWA VS AUSE: Sectors and Top Holdings
EWA primarily invests in a diverse array of Australian companies across multiple sectors, including financials, materials, and healthcare. On the other hand, AUSE focuses on companies with robust dividend yields, such as Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Westpac Banking Corporation, and BHP Group. The differentiation in sectors and top holdings between these two ETFs plays a pivotal role in shaping their performance trajectories.

![EWA overlap EWA VS AUSE: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## EWA VS AUSE: Capitalization and Strategy
EWA boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicative of its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the Australian equity market. AUSE, driven by its dividend strategy, strives to provide investors with a steady stream of income. The variance in capitalization and strategy introduces distinct investment dynamics, underscoring the necessity for thorough consideration by potential investors.

## EWA VS AUSE: Tracking and Exposure
EWA aims to mirror the performance of the MSCI Australia Index, capturing the overall movements of the Australian equity market. In contrast, AUSE concentrates on dividend-paying stocks, and its underlying index methodology takes dividend yield into account when selecting its components. Divergent tracking and exposure methodologies enable investors to tailor their portfolio choices according to their risk appetite and investment objectives.

## Conclusion
EWA and AUSE exemplify the diversity within the ETF landscape, offering investors specialized avenues to engage with the Australian market. For those who seek to gain deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other intricate details, ETF insider stands as an invaluable resource. With a user-friendly app, investors can access comprehensive information about these and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:


[EWA ETF issuer](https://www.ishares.com/)
[EWA ETF official page](https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239607/ishares-msci-australia-etf)

#### EWA quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [EWA](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa) [iShares MSCI Australia ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/ewa), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

EWA VS AUSE are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

EWA VS AUSE: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become integral tools for investors seeking diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a thorough comparison between two prominent ETFs: CNDA (iShares MSCI Canada ETF) and [HEWC](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/hewc) (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Canada ETF). We will analyze crucial factors such as tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## CNDA VS HEWC: Overview
CNDA and HEWC are both ETFs that focus on Canadian equities. However, they differ in their approach due to currency hedging. While CNDA provides exposure to the Canadian stock market without currency hedging, HEWC aims to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar. This distinction in currency exposure is a key consideration for investors evaluating these ETFs.

## CNDA VS HEWC: Sectors and Top Holdings
The CNDA ETF offers broad exposure to various sectors within the Canadian equity market. Its top holdings often include well-established Canadian companies across industries such as finance, energy, and technology. On the other hand, HEWC's portfolio also encompasses these sectors, but its currency-hedged strategy can impact the performance of individual holdings based on currency movements.

![CNDA overlap CNDA VS HEWC: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## CNDA VS HEWC: Capitalization and Strategy
CNDA and HEWC have different capitalizations and strategies due to their currency exposure approaches. CNDA's asset under management (AUM) reflects its popularity as an unhedged Canadian equity ETF. HEWC, by employing currency hedging, seeks to mitigate the impact of exchange rate fluctuations between the Canadian and U.S. dollars. Investors should consider the trade-offs between currency protection and potential returns.

## CNDA VS HEWC: Tracking and Exposure
CNDA seeks to closely replicate the performance of the MSCI Canada Index, offering investors exposure to the overall Canadian equity market. HEWC, in addition to tracking the MSCI Canada Index, implements a currency-hedged strategy to reduce the influence of currency fluctuations on returns. Understanding the tracking methodologies and exposure dynamics is essential for investors to make informed decisions.

## Conclusion
CNDA and HEWC present distinct approaches to investing in the Canadian equity market, with CNDA offering unhedged exposure and HEWC providing currency-hedged exposure. As investors consider their preferences for currency risk and potential returns, tools like ETF insider can provide valuable insights into the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other essential information. With its user-friendly app, ETF insider empowers investors to navigate the complexities of these and other financial instruments effectively.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

iShares by BlackRock official websites for CNDA and HEWC
MSCI Canada Index methodology and constituent data




:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

CNDA and HEWC are both ETFs that focus on Canadian equities. However, they differ in their approach due to currency hedging. Read our article.

CNDA VS HEWC: Capitalization and Strategy


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have brought a new dimension to the world of investments, offering exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive comparison between two prominent currency ETFs: [FXC](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/fxc) (Invesco CurrencyShares Canadian Dollar Trust) and [HEWC](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/hewc) (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Canada ETF). Our analysis will cover essential aspects such as tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## FXC VS HEWC: Overview
FXC and HEWC are two currency ETFs with differing investment strategies targeting the Canadian dollar. While FXC tracks the value of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar, HEWC incorporates a currency hedging strategy to minimize the impact of currency fluctuations for U.S. investors. These distinct approaches result in different exposures and risk considerations, which we'll delve into further.

## FXC VS HEWC: Sectors and Top Holdings
The FXC ETF focuses on the Canadian dollar's value and its top holding is the Canadian dollar itself. HEWC, on the other hand, aims to provide U.S. investors exposure to Canadian equities while minimizing the currency risk. Understanding the sectors and top holdings can help investors decide which currency ETF aligns better with their investment goals and risk tolerance.

![FXC overlap FXC VS HEWC: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## FXC VS HEWC: Capitalization and Strategy
FXC has a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors looking to gain direct exposure to the Canadian dollar's value. HEWC's strategy is geared towards shielding investors from potential losses due to currency fluctuations. The difference in capitalization and strategy between the two ETFs introduces distinct opportunities for returns and risk levels, necessitating careful consideration by investors.

## FXC VS HEWC: Tracking and Exposure
FXC tracks the price of the Canadian dollar through a straightforward mechanism, providing investors with a direct reflection of the currency's movement. HEWC, however, incorporates a currency hedging strategy to mitigate the effects of currency volatility for U.S. investors while offering exposure to Canadian equities. Understanding these tracking and exposure methodologies is crucial for investors seeking to navigate the nuances of currency ETFs.

## Conclusion
FXC and HEWC offer unique perspectives for investors interested in gaining exposure to the Canadian dollar. Whether investors want a direct link to the currency's value or seek to minimize currency risk while investing in Canadian equities, these ETFs provide distinct strategies. To explore further insights into these ETFs' holdings, correlations, and overlaps, consider using ETF insider—an intuitive app offering comprehensive details on various financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:


[FXC ETF issuer](https://www.ishares.com/)
[FXC ETF official page](https://www.ishares.com/uk/individual/en/products/251798/ishares-china-large-cap-ucits-etf)

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

FXC VS hewc are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

FXC VS HEWC: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape by providing investors with diverse exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [FXC](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/fxc) (CurrencyShares Canadian Dollar Trust) and CNDA (IQ Canada Small Cap ETF). We'll delve into key aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## FXC VS CNDA: Overview
FXC and CNDA represent different investment opportunities within the Canadian market. FXC is designed to track the performance of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar, providing investors with a direct exposure to the currency's movements. In contrast, CNDA focuses on Canadian small-cap stocks, aiming to capture growth potential within this specific segment of the market.

## FXC VS CNDA: Sectors and Top Holdings
FXC primarily tracks the Canadian dollar's exchange rate, and its holdings consist of foreign exchange instruments. On the other hand, CNDA invests in Canadian small-cap stocks from various sectors such as industrials, consumer discretionary, and technology. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs enables investors to assess their alignment with investment objectives and risk tolerance.

![FXC overlap FXC VS CNDA: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## FXC VS CNDA: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
FXC's assets under management (AUM) reflect its popularity among investors seeking currency exposure. Its strategy revolves around mirroring the movements of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar. CNDA's investment approach focuses on small-cap companies within Canada, potentially offering growth opportunities. The difference in capitalization and strategy between the two ETFs leads to distinct risk-return profiles.

## FXC VS CNDA: Tracking Methods and Exposure
FXC's goal is to provide investors with exposure to changes in the Canadian dollar's exchange rate. It achieves this through currency derivatives and money market instruments. In contrast, CNDA aims to replicate the performance of the IQ Canada Small Cap Index, which includes small-cap companies listed on Canadian exchanges. Understanding the tracking methods and exposure mechanisms helps investors make informed decisions based on their investment preferences.

## Conclusion
FXC and CNDA offer unique investment opportunities catering to distinct investor needs. For those seeking insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other valuable information, ETF insider stands as an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, investors can gain comprehensive insights into various financial instruments, aiding their decision-making process.

Disclaimer: This article does not offer any investment advisory services.

Sources:


[FXC ETF issuer](https://www.ishares.com/)
[FXC ETF official page](https://www.ishares.com/uk/individual/en/products/251798/ishares-china-large-cap-ucits-etf)

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

FXC VS CNDA are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

Blog