
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become integral to modern investment strategies, providing investors with diversified exposure across a range of sectors and asset classes. In this comprehensive analysis, we will undertake a thorough comparison between two prominent ETFs: [POTX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/potx) (Global X Cannabis ETF) and [YOLO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/yolo) (AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF). We'll delve into key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## POTX VS YOLO: Overview
POTX and YOLO are two ETFs with distinct approaches within the burgeoning cannabis industry. While POTX targets the global cannabis market, YOLO focuses on providing exposure to the broader cannabis ecosystem. This difference in scope results in divergent holdings and risk profiles, factors that we'll explore in the following sections.

## POTX VS YOLO: Sectors and Top Holdings
The POTX ETF is designed to cover the entire cannabis supply chain, including cultivation, production, and distribution. Its top holdings include leading cannabis companies such as Canopy Growth, GW Pharmaceuticals, and Cronos Group. YOLO, on the other hand, emphasizes North American cannabis companies, with holdings like Tilray, Aphria, and Aurora Cannabis. Analyzing the sectors and top holdings can aid investors in making informed decisions based on their investment objectives.

![POTX overlap POTX VS YOLO: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## POTX VS YOLO: Capitalization and Strategy
POTX boasts a notable asset under management (AUM), signifying its popularity among investors seeking comprehensive exposure to the global cannabis industry. YOLO's strategy revolves around providing access to a diversified portfolio of cannabis-related companies. The variance in capitalization and strategy between these ETFs introduces differing potential returns and levels of risk, requiring careful consideration by investors.

## POTX VS YOLO: Tracking and Exposure
POTX seeks to provide investors with exposure to the entire cannabis market, from cultivation and production to distribution and ancillary services. YOLO, meanwhile, aims to capture the performance of North American companies that are part of the cannabis ecosystem. The methods of tracking and exposure differ: POTX encompasses global cannabis-related activities, while YOLO's focus is on a specific region. Understanding these distinctions assists investors in selecting the ETF that aligns with their investment goals.

## Conclusion
POTX and YOLO represent distinctive approaches to investing in the rapidly evolving cannabis industry. For those seeking a deeper understanding of holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insights, the ETF Insider offers a comprehensive platform. Through its user-friendly app, investors can gain extensive insights into these ETFs and other financial instruments, aiding in informed decision-making.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

Global X Cannabis ETF (POTX) Official Website
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) Official Website


[POTX ETF issuer](https://www.globalxetfs.com/)
[POTX ETF official page](https://www.globalxetfs.com/funds/potx/)

#### YOLO quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [YOLO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/yolo) [AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/yolo), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

POTX VS YOLO are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

POTX VS YOLO: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become essential tools in modern investment portfolios, offering diverse exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this comprehensive analysis, we will delve into a detailed comparison between two prominent ETFs: [CNBS](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/cnbs) (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) and [MSOS](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/msos) (AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF). This examination will cover key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## CNBS VS MSOS: Overview
CNBS and MSOS represent two ETFs that provide investors with exposure to the burgeoning cannabis industry in the United States. While both ETFs focus on the cannabis sector, they may differ in terms of their underlying holdings, investment strategies, and market outlook. This comparison aims to shed light on the nuances of these two investment options.

## CNBS VS MSOS: Sectors and Top Holdings
CNBS primarily invests in companies that are involved in the cannabis industry's various segments, including cultivation, production, distribution, and research. On the other hand, MSOS focuses on companies that are directly involved in the legal cultivation, production, and distribution of cannabis in the U.S. The sectors and top holdings of these ETFs offer insights into the specific areas of the cannabis market that each ETF targets.

![CNBS overlap CNBS VS MSOS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## CNBS VS MSOS: Capitalization and Strategy
CNBS and MSOS differ in terms of capitalization and investment strategy. CNBS aims to provide exposure to a broad spectrum of cannabis-related companies, which may include both established players and emerging businesses. In contrast, MSOS concentrates on U.S. cannabis companies that generate the majority of their revenue from legal cannabis operations. These distinctions can impact the risk and potential returns associated with each ETF.

## CNBS VS MSOS: Tracking and Exposure
CNBS and MSOS employ different strategies to track their respective cannabis-related indexes. CNBS seeks to replicate the performance of the Prime Cannabis Index, which includes companies involved in various aspects of the cannabis ecosystem. MSOS, on the other hand, tracks the performance of the AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis Index, focusing on U.S.-based companies operating within the legal cannabis industry. Understanding these tracking methodologies is crucial for investors aiming to align their portfolios with their investment objectives.

## Conclusion
CNBS and MSOS cater to investors interested in gaining exposure to the evolving U.S. cannabis industry. As the cannabis market continues to evolve, these ETFs offer distinct approaches to capturing potential growth and navigating associated risks. For investors seeking comprehensive insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other valuable details, ETF insider provides a user-friendly app that offers comprehensive information on these financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:
- Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) Official Website
- AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) Official Website


[CNBS ETF issuer](https://amplifyetfs.com/)
[CNBS ETF official page](https://amplifyetfs.com/cnbs/)

#### MSOS quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [MSOS](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/msos) [AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/msos), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

We will delve into a detailed comparison between two prominent ETFs: CNBS (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) and MSOS (AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF).

CNBS VS MSOS: Tracking and Exposure


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have significantly transformed the investment landscape, offering investors diversified exposure to a wide range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two popular ETFs: [CNBS](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/cnbs) (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) and [YOLO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/yolo) (AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF). Throughout the article, we will delve into various critical aspects, including ticker symbols, full names, issuers, sector focus, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## CNBS VS YOLO: Overview
CNBS and YOLO are two ETFs that provide distinct strategies within the rapidly evolving cannabis industry. While CNBS offers exposure to companies involved in the cannabis and hemp ecosystem, YOLO focuses on companies that derive a significant portion of their revenue from the legal cannabis sector. The differing investment approaches result in varying risk profiles and potential returns, which we will dissect in the following sections.

## CNBS VS YOLO: Sectors and Top Holdings
CNBS's primary sector focus includes cannabis cultivation, distribution, and ancillary services. Its top holdings consist of companies like GW Pharmaceuticals, Aurora Cannabis, and Cronos Group. On the other hand, YOLO invests in various segments of the cannabis industry, including pharmaceuticals, consumer products, and cultivation. Top holdings for YOLO include Innovative Industrial Properties, Canopy Growth, and Aphria. A clear understanding of the sectors and top holdings aids investors in aligning their investment goals with the appropriate ETF.

![CNBS overlap CNBS VS YOLO: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## CNBS VS YOLO: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
CNBS boasts a significant asset under management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors interested in the cannabis industry. YOLO's strategy centers around capturing the performance of a diversified group of cannabis-related companies. The disparity in capitalization and investment approach between these ETFs introduces varying levels of risk and potential reward, prompting investors to carefully evaluate their investment objectives.

## CNBS VS YOLO: Tracking and Exposure
CNBS tracks an index that includes companies operating across the cannabis supply chain, while YOLO provides exposure to both domestic and international companies engaged in the cannabis sector. CNBS's approach involves investing in companies contributing to the legal cannabis market's growth, whereas YOLO targets companies with substantial revenue from cannabis-related activities. The differences in tracking and exposure mechanisms offer investors the opportunity to choose the ETF that aligns with their preferences and risk appetite.

## Conclusion
CNBS and YOLO offer distinct investment avenues for those seeking exposure to the burgeoning cannabis industry. To gain deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other crucial information, investors can turn to ETF insider—an invaluable tool for exploring various financial instruments. With its user-friendly app, ETF insider empowers investors with comprehensive details, aiding them in making informed investment decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) Prospectus
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) Prospectus


[CNBS ETF issuer](https://amplifyetfs.com/)
[CNBS ETF official page](https://amplifyetfs.com/cnbs/)

#### YOLO quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [YOLO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/yolo) [AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/yolo), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

We will conduct an in-depth comparison between two popular ETFs: CNBS (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) and YOLO (AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF).

CNBS VS YOLO: Sectors and Top Holdings


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of investment, offering a diverse range of exposures across various industries and asset classes. In this comprehensive analysis, we will conduct a detailed comparison between two prominent ETFs: [CNBS](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/cnbs) (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) and [POTX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/potx) (Global X Cannabis ETF). We'll delve into key aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategies, tracking methodologies, and exposure.

## CNBS VS POTX: Overview
CNBS and POTX are distinct ETFs that cater to different strategies within the cannabis industry. While CNBS is designed to capture the overall cannabis market, POTX focuses on the global cannabis industry, including both medicinal and recreational aspects. This distinction in approach results in varying exposures and risk profiles, a deeper examination of which follows.

## CNBS VS POTX: Sectors and Top Holdings
The CNBS ETF provides exposure to various segments of the cannabis market, encompassing both plant-touching and ancillary businesses. On the other hand, POTX concentrates on global companies engaged in the cannabis ecosystem, including cultivation, distribution, pharmaceuticals, and research. Understanding the sectors and top holdings assists investors in choosing an ETF that aligns with their investment objectives and risk tolerance.

![CNBS overlap CNBS VS POTX: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## CNBS VS POTX: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
CNBS exhibits a noteworthy asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking broad exposure to the cannabis industry. POTX's strategy revolves around targeting companies from around the world that are actively involved in the cannabis sector. The variance in capitalization and investment strategy between the two ETFs creates different potential returns and risk levels, necessitating careful consideration by investors.

## CNBS VS POTX: Tracking Methodology and Exposure
CNBS seeks to track the performance of the Seymour Cannabis Index, which includes a wide array of cannabis-related companies. In contrast, POTX aims to mirror the performance of the Cannabis Index created by the Solactive AG Index Committee, comprising global companies engaged in the cannabis industry. Understanding the tracking methodologies and exposure strategies is crucial for investors seeking to align their portfolios with their investment goals.

## Conclusion
CNBS and POTX are distinct ETFs that offer unique approaches to investing in the burgeoning cannabis market. For investors desiring deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other valuable information, ETF Insider serves as an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, ETF Insider provides comprehensive details about these and other financial instruments, aiding investors in making well-informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is intended solely for informational purposes and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:


[CNBS ETF issuer](https://amplifyetfs.com/)
[CNBS ETF official page](https://amplifyetfs.com/cnbs/)

#### CNBS quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [CNBS](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/cnbs) [Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/cnbs), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

In this analysis, we will conduct a detailed comparison between two prominent ETFs: CNBS (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) and POTX (Global X Cannabis ETF).

CNBS VS POTX: A Comparison of ETFs

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, providing investors with diversified exposure to a wide range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [THCX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/thcx) (The Cannabis ETF) and [CNBS](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/cnbs) (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF). Our analysis will encompass crucial aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## THCX VS CNBS: Overview
THCX and CNBS represent distinct investment strategies within the rapidly growing cannabis industry. While THCX seeks to track the overall performance of companies engaged in the legal cannabis and hemp industries, CNBS focuses on providing exposure to the global cannabis sector. These differences in focus translate to diverse risk profiles and potential returns, as we will delve into further in the subsequent sections.

## THCX VS CNBS: Sectors and Top Holdings
The primary focus of THCX is on companies involved in various aspects of the cannabis and hemp industries, spanning from cultivation to distribution. Its top holdings include prominent cannabis companies like Tilray, Canopy Growth, and Aurora Cannabis. On the other hand, CNBS offers exposure to global cannabis-related companies, emphasizing areas such as biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, and retail. Understanding the sectors and top holdings aids investors in aligning their investment goals with the ETF that best suits their preferences.

![THCX overlap THCX VS CNBS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## THCX VS CNBS: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
THCX boasts a considerable asset under management (AUM), indicative of its popularity among investors interested in the cannabis sector. Its investment strategy revolves around capturing the performance of a diversified portfolio of cannabis-related companies. In contrast, CNBS employs a strategy curated by Tim Seymour, a well-known investor and contributor to CNBC's "Fast Money," aiming to offer exposure to companies across the cannabis value chain. The differences in capitalization and strategy between these ETFs necessitate careful consideration based on investors' risk tolerance and return expectations.

## THCX VS CNBS: Tracking Methods and Exposure
THCX's objective is to mirror the performance of the Innovation Labs Cannabis Index, a benchmark that includes companies operating in both medical and recreational cannabis sectors. CNBS, on the other hand, aims to provide exposure to the full spectrum of the cannabis industry, including both U.S. and non-U.S. companies. The tracking methods employed by these ETFs vary due to their distinct investment objectives, highlighting the importance of understanding their underlying methodologies.

## Conclusion
THCX and CNBS are distinct ETFs that cater to investors seeking exposure to the burgeoning cannabis industry. To gain deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical aspects, investors can turn to tools like ETF Insider. This user-friendly app facilitates comprehensive exploration of these financial instruments and empowers investors to make informed decisions aligned with their investment goals and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services. Investors are encouraged to conduct thorough research and consult with financial professionals before making any investment decisions.


[THCX ETF issuer](https://www.axsinvestments.com/)
[THCX ETF official page](https://www.axsinvestments.com/thcx/)

#### CNBS quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [CNBS](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/cnbs) [Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/cnbs), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

THCX VS CNBS are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

THCX VS CNBS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, offering investors diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison of two notable ETFs: [MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj) (ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF) and [MSOS](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/msos) (AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF). We'll explore key aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategies, tracking methods, and exposure.

## MJ VS MSOS: Overview
[MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj) and MSOS represent distinct approaches to investing in the cannabis industry. While [MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj) provides exposure to a broader range of companies involved in the global cannabis ecosystem, MSOS focuses exclusively on U.S. companies engaged in legal cannabis activities. This fundamental difference leads to diverse investment implications and considerations.

## MJ VS MSOS: Sectors and Top Holdings
The [MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj) ETF encompasses a variety of sectors related to cannabis, including pharmaceuticals, cultivation and retail, and ancillary businesses. Its top holdings include prominent companies like Canopy Growth, GW Pharmaceuticals, and Cronos Group. On the other hand, MSOS concentrates solely on U.S. companies that operate within the cannabis industry, offering investors targeted exposure to the U.S. market.

![MJ overlap MJ VS MSOS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## MJ VS MSOS: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
[MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj)'s sizable asset under management (AUM) reflects its popularity among investors interested in gaining exposure to the cannabis sector. The fund's strategy aims to capture the potential growth across various segments of the global cannabis market. MSOS, with its specific focus on U.S. cannabis companies, offers investors a unique way to access the growth potential of this burgeoning industry.

## MJ VS MSOS: Tracking Methods and Exposure
The [MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj) ETF tracks an index that includes companies from around the world engaged in various aspects of the cannabis industry. This approach provides investors with a broader geographic exposure to the evolving cannabis landscape. In contrast, MSOS is designed to track a U.S.-centric index, offering concentrated exposure to the regulatory environment, legal developments, and market dynamics within the United States.

## Conclusion
[MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj) and MSOS are distinctive ETFs that cater to different investment preferences within the cannabis sector. Whether you're interested in global cannabis opportunities or a laser-focused approach to U.S. cannabis companies, these ETFs provide avenues for potential growth. For those seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical details, consider using ETF insider—an intuitive app that offers comprehensive information on various financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

ETF issuers' official websites
Financial news sources
Fund prospectuses and fact sheets


[MJ ETF issuer](https://finance.yahoo.com/)
[MJ ETF official page](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/MJ/)

#### MSOS quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [MSOS](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/msos) [AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/msos), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

MJ VS msos are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

MJ VS MSOS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have revolutionized the investment landscape, offering diversified exposure across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: [MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj) (ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF) and [YOLO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/yolo) (AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF). We will explore key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## MJ VS YOLO: Overview
[MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj) and YOLO are two ETFs that provide investors with exposure to the burgeoning cannabis industry. [MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj), the ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF, focuses on the broader cannabis sector, including companies involved in cultivation, distribution, and ancillary businesses. On the other hand, YOLO, the AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF, offers a more concentrated approach, investing primarily in companies engaged in legal cannabis cultivation and production. Understanding their differing scopes is essential for investors looking to capitalize on the growth potential of the cannabis market.

## MJ VS YOLO: Sectors and Top Holdings
The [MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj) ETF encompasses a wider range of sectors within the cannabis industry, including pharmaceuticals, consumer goods, and agriculture. Its top holdings consist of companies like Tilray, Canopy Growth, and GW Pharmaceuticals. In contrast, YOLO focuses exclusively on the cannabis ecosystem, with top holdings such as Trulieve Cannabis and GrowGeneration. Examining the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs helps investors align their investment objectives with the companies they believe have the greatest potential for growth.

![MJ overlap MJ VS YOLO: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## MJ VS YOLO: Capitalization and Strategy
[MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj) has garnered a substantial asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity as a choice for investors seeking exposure to the cannabis industry. The fund's strategy revolves around providing a broad representation of the cannabis market, offering diversification across various sub-sectors. YOLO's strategy is more concentrated, targeting companies directly involved in the cannabis value chain. The differences in capitalization and strategy between [MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj) and YOLO lead to varying levels of risk and return potential, allowing investors to choose the option that aligns with their risk tolerance and investment goals.

## MJ VS YOLO: Tracking and Exposure
The [MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj) ETF aims to track the Prime Alternative Harvest Index, which includes global companies engaged in legal cannabis-related activities. YOLO, on the other hand, tracks the Innovation Labs Cannabis Index, focusing on North American companies that derive significant revenue from legal cannabis operations. While both ETFs offer exposure to the cannabis market, their tracking methods and geographic focus differ, potentially leading to variations in performance based on regulatory and market trends.

## Conclusion
[MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj) and YOLO represent distinct approaches to investing in the cannabis industry, catering to different investor preferences and risk appetites. As the cannabis market continues to evolve, ETFs like these provide opportunities to participate in its growth potential. For those seeking deeper insights into the holdings, correlations, and other nuances of these ETFs, platforms like ETF insider offer valuable tools for informed decision-making. With user-friendly apps, investors can access comprehensive information to navigate the complexities of financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF ([MJ](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/mj)) Fact Sheet
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) Fact Sheet


[MJ ETF issuer](https://finance.yahoo.com/)
[MJ ETF official page](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/MJ/)

#### YOLO quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [YOLO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/yolo) [AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/yolo), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

MJ VS YOLO are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

MJ VS YOLO: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, offering diversified exposure across a range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: TBLU (TrueShares [ESG](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/esg) Active Opportunities ETF) and [PIO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pio) (Invesco Global Water ETF). We'll delve into various aspects, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## TBLU VS PIO: Overview
TBLU and PIO represent two distinct investment strategies within the realm of socially responsible investing (SRI). While TBLU focuses on actively managed environmental, social, and governance (ESG) opportunities, PIO targets companies involved in the global water industry. This divergence in focus leads to differing exposures and potential outcomes, which we'll explore in the subsequent sections.

## TBLU VS PIO: Sectors and Top Holdings
The TBLU ETF concentrates on a diverse range of companies that align with ESG principles, spanning sectors like technology, healthcare, and renewable energy. Its top holdings may include names such as Microsoft, Alphabet, and Tesla, reflecting companies with strong ESG practices. In contrast, PIO invests in companies associated with the global water cycle, encompassing water utilities, equipment providers, and infrastructure developers. Notable holdings of PIO might include American Water Works, Xylem, and Veolia Environment. Recognizing the sectors and top holdings aids investors in selecting the ETF that resonates with their ethical and financial objectives.

![TBLU overlap TBLU VS PIO: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## TBLU VS PIO: Capitalization and Strategy
TBLU boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicating its appeal to investors with a focus on ESG values. The fund's active management strategy seeks to identify companies with robust ESG practices and growth potential. In contrast, PIO's strategy revolves around capitalizing on the global water scarcity theme, targeting companies positioned to address water-related challenges. Distinct capitalization levels and strategic approaches between the two ETFs introduce varying possibilities for returns and risk, necessitating thoughtful consideration by investors.

## TBLU VS PIO: Tracking and Exposure
TBLU's objective is to provide investors exposure to a diversified portfolio of companies with strong ESG profiles. Its active management style allows for flexibility in adapting to changing market dynamics while staying aligned with ESG principles. On the other hand, PIO focuses on tracking an index comprising companies actively engaged in the global water industry. The differing tracking methods between TBLU and PIO stem from their distinct investment strategies and thematic focuses. Understanding these tracking nuances assists investors in selecting the ETF that aligns with their investment goals.

## Conclusion
TBLU and PIO represent unique approaches to socially responsible investing, with each ETF catering to a specific thematic objective. For investors seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other vital information, ETF Insider offers a valuable tool. Through its user-friendly app, investors can access comprehensive details on these and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not offer any investment advisory services.

Sources:


[TBLU ETF issuer](https://finance.yahoo.com/)
[TBLU ETF official page](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TBLU/)

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

TBLU VS pio are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

TBLU VS PIO: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


When it comes to investing in water-related assets, two ETFs often stand out: [FIW](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/fiw) (First Trust Water ETF) and [PIO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pio) (Invesco Global Water ETF). These investment vehicles have specific strategies, fees, and risk profiles that you need to consider. This blog post aims to provide an in-depth comparison of FIW Vs PIO, helping you make a well-informed investment decision.

##  FIW Vs PIO: The Issuers Behind the ETF’s 
First Trust Advisors L.P. manages the First Trust Water ETF (FIW). The firm is renowned for its specialized thematic ETFs. FIW aims to track the ISE Clean Edge Water Index, offering investors exposure to companies involved in water-related businesses.
Invesco is the company behind the Invesco Global Water ETF (PIO). Invesco is a global investment management firm that specializes in various financial instruments. PIO targets the NASDAQ OMX Global Water Index, focusing on global companies that create products designed to conserve and purify water.

##  Investment Objectives: FIW Vs PIO
FIW aims to offer investment returns that closely replicate the performance of the ISE Clean Edge Water Index. This index focuses on U.S. companies with a predominant share of their business activities in the water sector. On the other hand, PIO aims to replicate the NASDAQ OMX Global Water Index, which includes companies involved in water utilities, infrastructure, and equipment, but on a global scale.


![FIW overlap FIW VS PIO: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

##  Asset Allocation: How FIW and PIO Differ
FIW mainly allocates assets in U.S.-based water companies. The index is composed of 36 companies, with the top sectors being water utilities and infrastructure. PIO, however, has a more global approach, incorporating companies from multiple countries and sectors. This makes PIO more diversified in terms of geographic allocation.
Cost is a vital factor in choosing an ETF. FIW comes with an expense ratio of 0.55%, which is slightly lower than PIO's 0.75%. This can make a significant difference in the long-term investment outcomes.

##  Performance: Tracking FIW and PIO Returns
Performance is one of the most scrutinized aspects when comparing ETFs. FIW has generally outperformed PIO in the past couple of years, delivering higher returns. However, PIO offers a more diversified portfolio, which could be advantageous in specific market conditions.
In terms of liquidity, FIW generally has higher daily trading volumes than PIO. Higher liquidity allows for easier entry and exit, which could be crucial for short-term traders.

##  Risks: Weighing the Downsides of FIW and PIO
Both FIW and PIO carry market risks, but PIO’s international exposure could make it more susceptible to currency and geopolitical risks. On the other hand, FIW’s concentration on the U.S. market might make it more volatile in response to domestic economic conditions.

##  Conclusion: FIW Vs PIO - Which One Suits You? 
While FIW and PIO both offer unique opportunities for investing in the water sector, your choice between the two should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and geographical preference. FIW offers a more focused approach to U.S. water-related companies, while PIO provides broader international exposure. The difference in fees and performance could also be deciding factors in your investment decision.

By understanding the issuers, objectives, and finer points of these ETFs, you'll be better equipped to choose between FIW and PIO. Choose wisely and invest smartly.


[FIW ETF issuer](https://finance.yahoo.com/)
[FIW ETF official page](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/FIW/)

#### FIW quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [FIW](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/fiw) [First Trust Water ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/fiw), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

FIW VS pio are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

ETF Comparisons