MUB VS LQD

Investing in the bond market offers diversification and stability to an investor's portfolio. Among the vast choices of bond ETFs, two that often spark debate are MUB (iShares National Muni Bond ETF) and LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF). In the battle of MUB VS LQD, which ETF stands tall? Let's delve into their characteristics to help you make an informed choice.

MUB VS LQD: Sectors and Top Holdings

Firstly, understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs can offer a glance into their potential risks and rewards.
MUB is focused on the municipal bonds market. These are the bonds issued by states, municipalities, or counties in the US. The benefit of MUB lies in its tax-exempt interest, especially for those in higher tax brackets. Key sectors represented in MUB's portfolio include healthcare, transportation, and utilities.
LQD, on the other hand, concentrates on corporate bonds, specifically those that are investment-grade. This means companies that issue these bonds have a relatively low risk of default. The top sectors in LQD’s portfolio range from financials to industrials and utilities. LQD's bonds are primarily issued by well-established companies, ensuring stability.
In the MUB VS LQD debate regarding sectors and holdings, it's clear that MUB offers tax benefits while LQD focuses on established corporates.

MUB overlap MUB VS LQD

MUB VS LQD: Capitalization strategy

Capitalization strategy refers to the approach adopted by ETFs in managing their assets.
MUB’s strategy leans towards the long end of the yield curve, indicating a preference for bonds that mature in the distant future. This means MUB might be more sensitive to interest rate fluctuations, but can offer higher yields in a stable rate environment.
LQD's capitalization is more spread out across the yield curve, from medium to long-term bonds. This diversification reduces the risk associated with interest rate changes, but can potentially offer a slightly lower yield than portfolios focused solely on long-term bonds.
When contrasting MUB VS LQD in capitalization, it becomes evident that MUB might be better suited for those looking for higher yields in stable rate conditions, whereas LQD offers a more balanced approach.

MUB VS LQD: Tracking and Exposure

An ETF's efficiency is also gauged by its ability to track its benchmark index closely.
MUB aims to track the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. Given the diversity of the municipal bond market, MUB provides broad exposure to various muni bonds, ensuring diversification within this specific segment.
LQD, on the other hand, targets the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index. This index encompasses a wide range of corporate bonds, offering a comprehensive look into the corporate bond sector.
In the MUB VS LQD comparison based on tracking and exposure, both ETFs provide a broad representation of their respective markets. The choice boils down to whether you prefer exposure to municipal or corporate bonds.

Conclusion

The MUB VS LQD debate isn’t about which ETF is universally better, but rather which aligns more closely with an individual's investment goals. For investors seeking tax-exempt income, MUB is a compelling choice. However, those who value the stability of investment-grade corporates might lean towards LQD.
It's crucial to recognize that both ETFs offer diversification within their respective bond sectors. As always, when making investment decisions, consider your financial goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon.

Sources:

iShares by BlackRock. (2021). iShares National Muni Bond ETF. [online]
iShares by BlackRock. (2021). iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF. [online]

MUB ETF issuer
MUB ETF official page

LQD quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF, access our dedicated page now.

Get started

Try ETF Insider