
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, providing investors with diverse exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [FIW](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/fiw) (First Trust Water ETF) and TBLU (Tortoise Digital Payments Infrastructure Fund). We'll explore essential aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## FIW VS TBLU: Overview
FIW and TBLU represent distinct sectors within the broader market. While FIW focuses on companies involved in the water industry, TBLU targets the digital payments infrastructure sector. This divergence in sector focus leads to differing exposures and risk profiles, which we'll delve into in the following sections.

## FIW VS TBLU: Sectors and Top Holdings
The FIW ETF concentrates on the water industry, investing in companies engaged in water utilities, infrastructure, and equipment. On the other hand, TBLU is centered around the digital payments infrastructure, with holdings in companies facilitating electronic payments and financial technology. Examining the sectors and top holdings provides insight into the specific areas each ETF emphasizes.

![FIW overlap FIW VS TBLU: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## FIW VS TBLU: Capitalization and Strategy
FIW boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), reflecting its appeal among investors seeking exposure to the water sector's potential growth. TBLU's strategy revolves around capitalizing on the expanding digital payments landscape. The difference in capitalization and strategic focus between the two ETFs introduces varying levels of potential return and risk, demanding careful consideration from investors.

## FIW VS TBLU: Tracking and Exposure
FIW aims to mirror the performance of an index composed of companies in the water sector. It seeks to provide investors with exposure to companies engaged in water supply, treatment, and technology. TBLU, on the other hand, tracks an index representing companies in the digital payments infrastructure space. Understanding these tracking and exposure methodologies is crucial for investors aiming to align their portfolios with specific industry trends.

## Conclusion
FIW and TBLU offer unique investment opportunities tailored to specific sectors within the market. For those interested in gaining deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical information, ETF Insider emerges as an indispensable tool. With its user-friendly application, ETF Insider empowers investors by providing comprehensive details on these ETFs and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:


[FIW ETF issuer](https://finance.yahoo.com/)
[FIW ETF official page](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/FIW/)

#### FIW quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [FIW](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/fiw) [First Trust Water ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/fiw), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

FIW VS TBLU are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

FIW VS TBLU: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape by offering diversified exposure across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we'll conduct a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: [CGW](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/cgw) (Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF) and [PIO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pio) (Invesco Global Water ETF). We will delve into the key aspects including tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## CGW VS PIO: Overview
CGW and PIO are two ETFs with a focus on the global water industry. CGW seeks to track the S&P Global Water Index, while PIO aims to replicate the Nasdaq OMX Global Water Index. These ETFs offer investors a way to gain exposure to companies involved in water infrastructure, technology, utilities, and related sectors.

## CGW VS PIO: Sectors and Top Holdings
The CGW ETF encompasses a range of sectors within the water industry, including water utilities, treatment, and equipment companies. Top holdings in CGW include industry leaders like American Water Works, Danaher Corporation, and Ecolab. Meanwhile, PIO's focus on the Nasdaq OMX Global Water Index means it also includes companies engaged in water-related businesses, such as utilities and equipment manufacturers.

![CGW overlap CGW VS PIO: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## CGW VS PIO: Capitalization and Strategy
Both CGW and PIO have significant assets under management, reflecting the growing interest in the water sector as a critical global resource. CGW's strategy involves tracking the performance of companies that are part of the S&P Global Water Index, while PIO follows the Nasdaq OMX Global Water Index, making it suitable for investors seeking exposure to international water-focused companies.

## CGW VS PIO: Tracking and Exposure
CGW's objective is to mirror the performance of the S&P Global Water Index, providing investors with exposure to global water-related companies. PIO, on the other hand, aims to replicate the performance of the Nasdaq OMX Global Water Index, which includes companies from various regions engaged in water-related activities. Understanding the tracking methodologies of these ETFs aids investors in choosing the one that aligns with their investment goals.

## Conclusion
CGW and PIO offer distinct approaches to investing in the global water sector. As investors seek deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other essential aspects, tools like ETF insider can provide valuable information. With a user-friendly app, ETF insider empowers investors with comprehensive details about these and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

Invesco. (n.d.). Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW). Retrieved from https://www.invesco.com/us/financial-products/etfs/product-detail?audienceType=Investor& ticker=CGW
Invesco. (n.d.). Invesco Global Water ETF (PIO). Retrieved from https://www.invesco.com/us/financial-products/etfs/product-detail?audienceType=Investor& ticker=PIO


[CGW ETF issuer](https://www.invesco.com/us/en/Individual-investor.html)
[CGW ETF official page](https://www.invesco.com/us/financial-products/etfs/product-detail?audienceType=investor&ticker=cgw)

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Both CGW and PIO have significant assets under management, reflecting the growing interest in the water sector as a critical global resource.

CGW VS PIO: Capitalization and Strategy | ETF Insider


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, offering diversified exposure across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a thorough comparison between two prominent ETFs: [CGW](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/cgw) (Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF) and TBLU (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF). We'll delve into their tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategies, tracking methods, and exposure.

## CGW VS TBLU: Overview
CGW and TBLU are distinct ETFs that cater to different industries. While CGW targets the global water sector, TBLU focuses on lithium and battery technology. This divergence in focus leads to contrasting risk profiles and potential returns, which we'll explore in the upcoming sections.

## CGW VS TBLU: Sectors and Top Holdings
The CGW ETF is centered around companies that operate in the water industry, encompassing segments like utilities, infrastructure, and equipment. On the other hand, TBLU invests in the lithium and battery technology sector, which includes companies involved in lithium mining, battery production, and energy storage. Understanding the sectors and top holdings helps investors make informed decisions aligned with their investment objectives.

![CGW overlap CGW VS TBLU: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## CGW VS TBLU: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
CGW boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), highlighting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the global water market. TBLU's strategy revolves around capturing the potential growth in lithium demand and battery technology advancement. The differing capitalization and investment strategies of these ETFs offer varying levels of risk and return potential, demanding careful consideration from investors.

## CGW VS TBLU: Tracking and Exposure
CGW's objective is to provide investors with exposure to companies operating in the water sector worldwide. In contrast, TBLU offers exposure to the lithium and battery technology industry. The tracking methods also differ; CGW tracks an index of water-related stocks, while TBLU tracks companies involved in lithium production and battery technology development. Understanding the tracking mechanisms and exposure strategies is essential for selecting the ETF that aligns with individual investment goals.

## Conclusion
CGW and TBLU are distinctive ETFs, each catering to specific industries with unique growth potential. For investors seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical information, ETF Insider stands as an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, ETF Insider provides comprehensive details about these and various other financial instruments, assisting investors in making well-informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) official website
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (TBLU) official website


[CGW ETF issuer](https://www.invesco.com/us/en/Individual-investor.html)
[CGW ETF official page](https://www.invesco.com/us/financial-products/etfs/product-detail?audienceType=investor&ticker=cgw)

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

CGW and TBLU are distinct ETFs that cater to different industries. CGW targets the global water sector, TBLU focuses on lithium and battery technology.

CGW VS TBLU: Capitalization Strategy | ETF Insider


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become a cornerstone of modern investing, providing investors with diverse exposure to various sectors and industries. In this article, we embark on a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: [CGW](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/cgw) (Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF) and [FIW](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/fiw) (First Trust Water ETF). We'll explore key aspects such as their tickers, full names, issuers, sector focus, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## CGW VS FIW: Overview
CGW and FIW are two ETFs that offer distinct ways to gain exposure to the global water industry. While CGW tracks an index of companies involved in water-related businesses, FIW provides exposure to U.S. companies focused on water infrastructure and technologies. This divergence in focus leads to different risk-return profiles, which we'll delve into further.

## CGW VS FIW: Sectors and Top Holdings
The CGW ETF concentrates on companies engaged in water-related activities such as water utilities, infrastructure development, and equipment manufacturing. Its top holdings include essential players like American Water Works, Danaher Corporation, and Ecolab Inc. In contrast, FIW's holdings revolve around U.S. firms related to water infrastructure, with American States Water Company, Mueller Water Products, and Essential Utilities among its primary components. Understanding these sectors and top holdings aids investors in aligning their investment objectives with the ETF that suits them best.

![CGW overlap CGW VS FIW: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## CGW VS FIW: Capitalization and Strategy
CGW's capitalization and asset under management reflect its global focus, offering exposure to a broad spectrum of water-related businesses. FIW, with its emphasis on U.S. water infrastructure, presents a more targeted strategy. CGW's approach involves tracking the performance of companies involved in water-related businesses worldwide, while FIW concentrates on the domestic market. Investors must evaluate these differences in capitalization and strategy to make informed decisions based on their risk appetite and investment goals.

## CGW VS FIW: Tracking and Exposure
CGW tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water Index, providing investors with a comprehensive view of the global water industry. On the other hand, FIW follows the ISE Clean Edge Water Index, focusing specifically on U.S. companies engaged in water-related activities. The tracking methodologies of these ETFs reflect their respective investment objectives, and investors should consider these distinctions when assessing their desired exposure.

## Conclusion
CGW and FIW offer unique pathways for investors to gain exposure to the water industry, each catering to specific areas of the market. For those seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other crucial data, ETF Insider provides an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, it facilitates an in-depth exploration of these ETFs and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide investment advisory services and should not be construed as financial advice.

Sources:

Invesco: CGW - Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF Overview
First Trust: FIW - First Trust Water ETF Overview


[CGW ETF issuer](https://www.invesco.com/us/en/Individual-investor.html)
[CGW ETF official page](https://www.invesco.com/us/financial-products/etfs/product-detail?audienceType=investor&ticker=cgw)

#### FIW quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [FIW](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/fiw) [First Trust Water ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/fiw), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

CGW and FIW offer unique pathways for investors to gain exposure to the water industry, each catering to specific areas of the market.

CGW VS FIW: Sectors and Top Holdings | ETF Insider


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have brought a new dimension to investing, offering diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we'll conduct an in-depth comparison of two prominent ETFs: [PHO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pho) (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and [PIO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pio) (Invesco Global Water ETF). We'll delve into their tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategies, tracking methods, and exposure levels.

## PHO VS PIO: Overview
PHO and PIO represent two ETFs that provide investors with exposure to the global water industry. However, their approaches differ. PHO targets companies involved in the water resources and water treatment sectors, while PIO aims to capture the performance of companies in the water infrastructure and technology industries. Let's explore the distinctions in their investment themes and objectives.

## PHO VS PIO: Sectors and Top Holdings
PHO primarily focuses on water utilities, equipment, and infrastructure companies. Its top holdings may include industry leaders like American Water Works, Xylem, and Essential Utilities. In contrast, PIO is designed to track companies engaged in water treatment, equipment, and technology. Understanding these sectors and their top holdings is essential for investors looking to align their portfolios with specific aspects of the water industry.

![PHO overlap PHO VS PIO: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## PHO VS PIO: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
PHO and PIO differ in terms of market capitalization and investment strategy. PHO, with its targeted approach to water resources, has built a substantial asset under management (AUM). Meanwhile, PIO's investment strategy revolves around the water infrastructure and technology sectors. These differences in capitalization and strategy contribute to the ETFs' unique risk-return profiles, which investors should consider when making investment decisions.

## PHO VS PIO: Tracking Methods and Exposure
PHO and PIO employ distinct tracking methods to achieve their objectives. PHO aims to replicate the performance of the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, composed of companies related to water supply, treatment, and equipment. On the other hand, PIO tracks the Nasdaq OMX Global Water Index, which includes companies involved in water infrastructure, distribution, and technology. Investors seeking exposure to different aspects of the water industry should take note of these tracking methodologies.

## Conclusion
PHO and PIO stand as notable options for investors seeking exposure to the water sector, each with its own specialized approach. To gain deeper insights into their holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other pertinent information, consider utilizing tools like ETF insider. This user-friendly app provides valuable information on various financial instruments, helping investors make informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) Fact Sheet
Invesco Global Water ETF (PIO) Fact Sheet


[PHO ETF issuer](https://www.invesco.com/us/en/Individual-investor.html)
[PHO ETF official page](https://www.invesco.com/us/financial-products/etfs/product-detail?audienceType=investor&ticker=pho)

#### PHO quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [PHO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pho) [Invesco Water Resources ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pho), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

PHO VS pio are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

PHO VS PIO: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have redefined investment strategies, providing investors with efficient and diversified exposure across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [PHO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pho) (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and TBLU (Tortoise Water Fund). Our analysis will encompass ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methodologies, and exposure.

## PHO VS TBLU: Overview
PHO and TBLU represent distinct investment approaches within the water industry. PHO, managed by Invesco, focuses on water resources, including companies engaged in water treatment, distribution, and conservation. TBLU, offered by Tortoise Advisors, emphasizes water infrastructure and seeks to capture the growth potential in this essential sector. These differing approaches lead to varying risk profiles and potential returns, which we'll explore in detail.

## PHO VS TBLU: Sectors and Top Holdings
The PHO ETF concentrates on companies involved in water-related activities such as utilities, equipment manufacturing, and water technology. Its holdings include corporations like American Water Works, Xylem, and Ecolab. TBLU, on the other hand, zeroes in on companies engaged in water infrastructure projects and services. Its top holdings encompass companies like Mueller Water Products and American States Water Company. Understanding these sectors and holdings is crucial for investors seeking exposure to specific segments of the water industry.

![PHO overlap PHO VS TBLU: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## PHO VS TBLU: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
PHO boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), a testament to its popularity among investors interested in water-related opportunities. TBLU's investment strategy centers around water infrastructure assets, with an aim to benefit from increased spending in this sector. The disparity in capitalization and investment strategy influences the potential for returns and level of risk inherent in each ETF, requiring investors to carefully evaluate their objectives.

## PHO VS TBLU: Tracking Methodologies and Exposure
PHO seeks to replicate the performance of the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, offering exposure to companies directly associated with the water industry. TBLU aims to track the Tortoise Global Water [ESG](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/esg) Total Return Index, which includes companies with significant involvement in water infrastructure and related activities. The differing tracking methodologies and exposures allow investors to choose between a broader water-related exposure and a more focused play on water infrastructure.

## Conclusion
PHO and TBLU cater to distinct aspects of the water industry, providing investors with targeted exposure to water-related opportunities. For those keen on delving into the intricacies of holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insights, ETF Insider serves as an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, ETF Insider offers comprehensive information about these ETFs and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not offer any investment advisory services.

Sources:


[PHO ETF issuer](https://www.invesco.com/us/en/Individual-investor.html)
[PHO ETF official page](https://www.invesco.com/us/financial-products/etfs/product-detail?audienceType=investor&ticker=pho)

#### PHO quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [PHO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pho) [Invesco Water Resources ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pho), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

PHO VS TBLU are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

PHO VS TBLU: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) play a pivotal role in modern investment portfolios, offering diverse exposure across industries and asset classes. In this article, we present an in-depth comparison between two notable ETFs: [PHO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pho) (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and [FIW](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/fiw) (First Trust Water ETF). Our analysis will cover essential aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## PHO VS FIW: Overview
PHO and FIW are two ETFs that focus on the water resources sector, an essential and rapidly evolving industry. While both ETFs target companies related to water, their approaches differ. PHO seeks exposure to water utility and equipment companies, while FIW casts a wider net by including companies involved in water treatment, distribution, and conservation technologies. This distinction in focus leads to varying investment opportunities and risks, which we will explore further.

## PHO VS FIW: Sectors and Top Holdings
The PHO ETF primarily concentrates on water utilities and equipment manufacturers, holding companies like American Water Works, Xylem, and IDEX Corporation. On the other hand, FIW encompasses a broader spectrum of water-related industries, with top holdings such as Danaher Corporation, Ecolab Inc., and Thermo Fisher Scientific. Investors interested in specific water-related niches can benefit from understanding these sector allocations and top holdings.

![PHO overlap PHO VS FIW: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## PHO VS FIW: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
PHO boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the water sector. Its strategy revolves around capturing the performance of companies directly engaged in water infrastructure and services. FIW's investment approach, on the other hand, encompasses a wider range of water-related industries, reflecting a broader perspective on the sector. Evaluating the differing capitalizations and strategies is crucial when considering these ETFs.

## PHO VS FIW: Tracking Methods and Exposure
PHO and FIW utilize distinct methodologies to provide exposure to the water sector. PHO tracks an index of water-related companies, aiming to replicate their performance. FIW, similarly, follows an index composed of water industry firms. Understanding the tracking methods and underlying indices of these ETFs is vital for investors seeking alignment with their investment goals and risk appetite.

## Conclusion
PHO and FIW offer investors unique opportunities to participate in the dynamic water resources sector. While PHO narrows its focus on water utilities and equipment manufacturers, FIW takes a more comprehensive approach by including various water-related industries. For individuals seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other crucial information, utilizing ETF insider—a user-friendly app—is a valuable tool. It empowers investors with a wealth of details about these and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:


[PHO ETF issuer](https://www.invesco.com/us/en/Individual-investor.html)
[PHO ETF official page](https://www.invesco.com/us/financial-products/etfs/product-detail?audienceType=investor&ticker=pho)

#### PHO quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [PHO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pho) [Invesco Water Resources ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pho), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

PHO VS FIW are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

PHO VS FIW: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


In the world of investing, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) provide a convenient and effective way to diversify your portfolio. Two of the most prominent ETFs in the water industry are [PHO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pho) (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and [CGW](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/cgw) (Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF). In this blog post, we'll dive into a side-by-side comparison of these two funds to help you decide which might be a better fit for your investment strategy.

## PHO Vs CGW Overview
The Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) aims to track the performance of the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, primarily focusing on companies that create products to conserve and purify water. On the other hand, the Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) seeks to replicate the S&P Global Water 50 Index, targeting companies around the world that are involved in water-related businesses.

## PHO Vs CGW Sectors and Top Holdings
PHO largely focuses on U.S-based companies and leans heavily towards industrials and utilities. The top holdings in PHO generally include companies such as Danaher Corp, IDEXX Laboratories, and Thermo Fisher Scientific. CGW, however, has a more global exposure, targeting both developed and emerging markets. It includes sectors like utilities, industrials, and healthcare, featuring top holdings like Veolia Environnement, Suez, and American Water Works.

![PHO overlap PHO VS CGW: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## PHO Vs CGW Capitalization Strategy
PHO has a significant inclination towards mid-cap and small-cap companies, making it slightly more volatile but potentially more rewarding in terms of growth. In contrast, CGW focuses more on large-cap stocks, offering stability and possibly lower returns in comparison to PHO. Both ETFs are managed by Invesco, a global independent investment management company.

## PHO Vs CGW Tracking and Exposure
PHO tracks the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index and invests primarily in U.S. companies. This offers a narrow but deep exposure to the U.S. water sector. CGW tracks the S&P Global Water 50 Index, providing a broader but shallower exposure to the global water industry. Both funds employ passive investment strategies, aiming to replicate the performance of their respective indices as closely as possible.

Conclusion:
When it comes to investing in water ETFs, both PHO and CGW present unique opportunities and challenges. PHO offers targeted exposure to the U.S. water sector, focusing on mid to small-cap companies, while CGW offers a broader, more diversified exposure to the global water industry through large-cap stocks. Both are managed by Invesco, a reputable issuer in the ETF space.

Your choice between PHO and CGW should be based on your investment goals, risk tolerance, and need for international exposure. No matter what you choose, investing in water is not just a potential money-maker; it's a step towards supporting an industry that is crucial for global sustainability.


[PHO ETF issuer](https://www.invesco.com/us/en/Individual-investor.html)
[PHO ETF official page](https://www.invesco.com/us/financial-products/etfs/product-detail?audienceType=investor&ticker=pho)

#### PHO quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [PHO](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pho) [Invesco Water Resources ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/pho), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

PHO VS CGW are specialized investment funds that focus on a diverse range of sectors in the financial market. these exchange-traded funds offer investors exposure to various industries and companies, presenting potential growth opportunities and risks. it's essential to understand the underlying assets and strategies of these etfs before considering an investment.

PHO VS CGW: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape by offering diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we delve into a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: [ARKX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/arkx) (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) and [ROKT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/rokt) (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF). We will explore essential aspects such as tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## ARKX VS ROKT: Overview
ARKX and ROKT are two ETFs that offer distinct strategies within the realm of space exploration and innovation. While ARKX focuses on companies involved in space travel, satellite technology, and space-related innovations, ROKT targets firms engaged in space-related activities across multiple industries. This divergence in focus leads to different investment exposures and potential risks, which we will analyze further.

## ARKX VS ROKT: Sectors and Top Holdings
The ARKX ETF concentrates on sectors such as satellite technology, space exploration, and autonomous vehicles. Its top holdings include companies like Trimble Inc., JD.com Inc., and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions Inc. On the other hand, ROKT invests in sectors like aerospace, satellite communications, and deep space exploration. Its top holdings comprise Maxar Technologies Inc., Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc., and Virgin Galactic Holdings Inc. Understanding the sectors and top holdings aids investors in choosing the ETF that aligns with their investment objectives.

![ARKX overlap ARKX VS ROKT: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)

## ARKX VS ROKT: Capitalization and Strategy
ARKX boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors interested in the space innovation sector. The fund's strategy involves investing in companies that are leading the way in space technology advancements. ROKT's strategy revolves around providing exposure to firms associated with space exploration, satellite technology, and advanced aerospace engineering. The difference in capitalization and strategy between the two ETFs results in varying potential returns and risk profiles for investors.

## ARKX VS ROKT: Tracking and Exposure
ARKX aims to provide investors with exposure to companies at the forefront of space exploration and technological advancements. Its holdings span across various industries, such as satellite-based internet providers, aerospace manufacturers, and companies involved in urban air mobility. ROKT, on the other hand, focuses on companies that contribute to the space industry's growth and innovation, including satellite communications, space tourism, and satellite imagery. Understanding the distinct tracking and exposure methods helps investors make informed decisions based on their preferences.

## Conclusion
ARKX and ROKT are unique ETFs that offer specialized approaches to investing in the rapidly evolving space innovation sector. For those seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical information, ETF insider provides an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, investors can gain comprehensive details about these and other financial instruments to make well-informed investment choices.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:


[ARKX ETF issuer](https://ark-funds.com/)
[ARKX ETF official page](https://ark-funds.com/funds/arkx/)

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

ARKX and ROKT are unique ETFs that offer specialized approaches to investing in the rapidly evolving space innovation sector. Read our article.

Blog