ASHR VS KWEB: A Comparison of ETFs
4 min read
By Beqa Bumbeishvili, ETF Insider

ASHR VS KWEB: A Comparison of ETFs

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of modern investing, providing diversified exposure to various sectors and assets. In this article, we delve into a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF). We'll explore key aspects including tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

ASHR VS KWEB: Overview

ASHR and KWEB are distinct ETFs offering exposure to different segments of the Chinese market. ASHR tracks the CSI 300 Index, consisting of China A-shares, which are stocks of Chinese companies listed on domestic exchanges. In contrast, KWEB focuses on the Chinese internet sector, investing in companies related to e-commerce, social media, online entertainment, and more. This divergence in focus leads to varying risk-return profiles, a theme we'll explore further.

ASHR VS KWEB: Sectors and Top Holdings

ASHR's primary focus is on China's domestic stock market, encompassing sectors like financials, industrials, and consumer discretionary. Its top holdings include leading Chinese companies like Ping An Insurance, Kweichow Moutai, and China Merchants Bank. On the other hand, KWEB's sectoral concentration is on internet-related industries, with top holdings such as Tencent, Alibaba, and Meituan Dianping. Understanding these sectors and holdings aids investors in selecting an ETF aligned with their investment objectives.

ASHR overlap ASHR VS KWEB: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFsASHR overlap ASHR VS KWEB: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

ASHR VS KWEB: Capitalization and Strategy

ASHR has a substantial asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to China's A-share market. Its strategy involves replicating the performance of the CSI 300 Index. KWEB, with a focus on the Chinese internet industry, presents a different strategy. Its AUM and investment approach offer exposure to the growth potential of China's thriving digital economy. The variation in capitalization and strategy underscores the distinct investment opportunities these ETFs offer.

ASHR VS KWEB: Tracking and Exposure

ASHR aims to mirror the performance of the CSI 300 Index, providing investors with exposure to a broad spectrum of China's domestic market. KWEB, however, zeroes in on the dynamic landscape of China's internet sector, capturing the growth potential of companies driving the nation's digital transformation. The differences in tracking and exposure highlight the ETFs' contrasting approaches to capturing market trends.

Conclusion

ASHR and KWEB represent unique investment avenues, each targeting different facets of China's complex economy. To gain deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other crucial aspects, ETF Insider emerges as an invaluable tool. Through its user-friendly app, it offers extensive information on these and other financial instruments, empowering investors to make informed decisions tailored to their preferences and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:
Information about ASHR and KWEB obtained from issuer documents and financial data.

ASHR ETF issuer
ASHR ETF official page

ASHR quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF, access our dedicated page now.

Get started