4 min read

PEK VS ASHR: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become integral to modern investment strategies, providing diversified exposure across various sectors and asset classes. This article presents a thorough comparison between two prominent ETFs: PEK (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC CSI 300 ETF) and ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF). We will delve into their tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategies, tracking methods, and exposure.

PEK VS ASHR: Overview

PEK and ASHR are two ETFs that offer distinct approaches to investing in China's A-share market. While PEK provides exposure to a diversified basket of China A-shares, ASHR specifically tracks the CSI 300 Index, representing the top 300 A-shares on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges. This contrast in focus results in differing risk-return profiles, which we will explore further.

PEK VS ASHR: Issuers

PEK is managed by VanEck, a reputable name in the ETF industry known for its innovative investment solutions. ASHR, on the other hand, is managed by Xtrackers, a subsidiary of DWS Group. Understanding the issuers can provide insights into the ETF's management philosophy, investment approach, and track record.

PEK overlap PEK VS ASHR: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

PEK VS ASHR: Sectors and Top Holdings

PEK offers broad exposure across various sectors within China's equity market, including finance, consumer goods, and technology. ASHR's focus on the CSI 300 Index means it concentrates on sectors that are representative of China's economy. Top holdings in PEK may differ from those in ASHR due to their distinct indexes, potentially leading to differences in performance during market fluctuations.

PEK VS ASHR: Capitalization and Strategy

PEK's capitalization reflects investor interest in gaining exposure to a diverse range of China A-shares. ASHR, with its focus on the CSI 300 Index, emphasizes the performance of China's top companies by market capitalization. Understanding their strategies can help investors assess whether they align with their investment goals and risk preferences.

PEK VS ASHR: Tracking and Exposure

PEK tracks an index that aims to capture the overall performance of China A-shares, offering investors a broad exposure to the Chinese equity market. ASHR's tracking of the CSI 300 Index provides targeted exposure to large-cap A-shares, making it a potential choice for those interested in China's top-performing companies. Evaluating the tracking methods and exposure of each ETF is essential for making informed investment decisions.

Conclusion

PEK and ASHR are unique ETFs that cater to different investment preferences within China's equity market. For investors seeking deeper insights into their holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other crucial information, ETF Insider serves as an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, investors can access comprehensive details about these financial instruments and more.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services. Always conduct thorough research and consider seeking advice from financial professionals before making investment decisions.

ASHR quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF, access our dedicated page now.

Get started

Try ETF Insider