GXC VS PEK: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

GXC vs PEK: Overview

When it comes to investing in China, the two prominent ETF options are SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC CSI 300 ETF (PEK). Both GXC and PEK are popular among investors for different reasons, but how do they stack up against each other? This article aims to shed light on the primary differences and similarities between GXC vs PEK in terms of sectors, top holdings, capitalization strategy, and tracking exposure.

GXC vs PEK: Sectors and Top Holdings

GXC focuses on a broad range of sectors within the Chinese market, including but not limited to technology, finance, and consumer goods. This diversification allows for more balanced risk exposure. On the other hand, PEK primarily aims at the top 300 A-shares from the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges, which also cover multiple sectors but are more focused on local Chinese companies.
As for the top holdings, GXC's portfolio is heavily tilted towards giants like Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu, which are globally recognized brands. PEK's holdings are more localized and are less known on the international stage but provide a pure play on the Chinese economy.

GXC overlap GXC VS PEK: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

GXC vs PEK: Capitalization Strategy

In terms of capitalization strategy, GXC primarily aims at large-cap and mega-cap Chinese companies. This makes the ETF less volatile compared to small-cap focused funds. PEK, meanwhile, has a more balanced approach, capturing companies across various sizes—large, medium, and small caps, thus offering a broader exposure to the market dynamics in China.
Both ETFs, GXC and PEK, employ indexing investment approaches to track their respective indices. GXC aims to replicate the performance of the S&P China BMI Index, while PEK targets the CSI 300 Index. Each fund tries to invest its assets in the stocks that make up these indices, mirroring the weightings as closely as possible.

GXC vs PEK: Tracking and Exposure

When it comes to tracking and exposure, both GXC and PEK have their unique merits. GXC offers a more global exposure to China's growth story, incorporating companies that have significant overseas operations. This can be beneficial for investors looking for a hybrid of local and global Chinese businesses
PEK, on the other hand, provides pure exposure to the mainland Chinese market through its focus on A-shares. This makes PEK more sensitive to domestic market conditions and regulatory changes, which could be seen as either a pro or a con, depending on your investment strategy and risk tolerance.

Conclusion:
In summary, both GXC and PEK offer valuable avenues for investing in the Chinese market, albeit with different focuses and strategies. GXC leans more towards globally recognized Chinese companies and primarily focuses on large-cap and mega-cap stocks. In contrast, PEK gives a purer exposure to the domestic Chinese market, covering a balanced range of company sizes. Depending on your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired market exposure, either GXC or PEK could serve as a suitable investment vehicle for tapping into the world’s second-largest economy.

GXC ETF issuer
GXC ETF official page

Get started

Try ETF Insider