PEK VS CNXT: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, providing investors with diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a thorough comparison between two prominent ETFs: PEK (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC CSI 300 ETF) and CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF). We'll explore essential aspects, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

PEK VS CNXT: Overview

PEK and CNXT are two ETFs with distinct investment approaches focused on China's equities market. While PEK tracks the CSI 300 Index, which represents 300 large-cap stocks on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges, CNXT targets the SME-ChiNext 100 Index, consisting of innovative small and medium-sized enterprises listed on the ChiNext board. This difference in index composition leads to contrasting investment profiles, which we'll delve into in the following sections.

PEK VS CNXT: Sectors and Top Holdings

PEK's portfolio is centered around large-cap companies in various sectors, including financials, consumer discretionary, and technology. In contrast, CNXT emphasizes smaller, growth-oriented companies, with its holdings spanning industries such as electronics, healthcare, and information technology. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs is essential for investors seeking exposure to specific segments of the Chinese market.

PEK overlap PEK VS CNXT: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

PEK VS CNXT: Capitalization and Investment Strategy

PEK's sizable assets under management (AUM) indicate its popularity among investors interested in broad exposure to China's largest companies. On the other hand, CNXT's strategy is tailored to capturing the potential growth of innovative SMEs within China's economy. The varying capitalization and investment strategy between PEK and CNXT result in different risk and return profiles, necessitating careful consideration based on investors' goals and risk tolerance.

PEK VS CNXT: Tracking Methods and Exposure

PEK tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index by investing in a representative sample of its constituents. This method aims to closely mirror the index's returns. CNXT, similarly, tracks the SME-ChiNext 100 Index by investing in a portfolio that mirrors the index's composition. However, the focus on smaller and more innovative companies in CNXT's index leads to a unique exposure profile compared to PEK.

Conclusion

PEK and CNXT offer distinct avenues for investors seeking exposure to China's equity markets. Determining the right fit requires a thorough understanding of the differences in index composition, sector allocation, and investment strategy. For those interested in gaining deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and more, ETF Insider serves as an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, investors can access comprehensive information on these and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

PEK ETF Overview: [Insert Source]
CNXT ETF Overview: [Insert Source]
CSI 300 Index Methodology: [Insert Source]
SME-ChiNext 100 Index Methodology: [Insert Source]

Get started

Try ETF Insider