GXC VS KWEB: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
4 min read
By Beqa Bumbeishvili, ETF Insider

GXC VS KWEB: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, providing investors with convenient access to diversified portfolios spanning various sectors and asset classes. In this comprehensive analysis, we'll conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: GXC (SPDR S&P China ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF). We will explore a range of factors including their tickers, full names, issuers, sector exposure, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategies, tracking methods, and overall market exposure.

GXC VS KWEB: Overview

GXC and KWEB are distinct ETFs that target different aspects of the Chinese market. GXC seeks to replicate the performance of the S&P China BMI Index, offering broad exposure to a diversified set of Chinese companies. On the other hand, KWEB is specifically focused on China's internet sector, providing investors with targeted exposure to companies involved in various aspects of the internet ecosystem.

GXC VS KWEB: Sector Exposure and Top Holdings

GXC's portfolio is designed to provide exposure across multiple sectors within the Chinese economy, including technology, finance, consumer goods, and more. KWEB, as an internet-focused ETF, is heavily concentrated in internet-related sectors such as e-commerce, social media, online entertainment, and online services. Top holdings of GXC may include companies like Tencent, Alibaba, and China Construction Bank, while KWEB's holdings could encompass Tencent, Alibaba, and Meituan Dianping, among others.

GXC overlap GXC VS KWEB: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFsGXC overlap GXC VS KWEB: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

GXC VS KWEB: Capitalization and Investment Strategy

The two ETFs differ in terms of capitalization and investment strategy. GXC, with its broader exposure, typically has a substantial asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking a diversified approach to the Chinese market. KWEB, with its narrow focus on the internet sector, may have a different risk-return profile due to its concentration in a specific industry.

GXC VS KWEB: Tracking and Overall Market Exposure

GXC tracks the performance of the S&P China BMI Index, which covers a wide range of Chinese stocks, aiming to capture the overall market trends of the Chinese economy. KWEB, on the other hand, tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, which specifically targets Chinese internet-related companies listed overseas. This distinction in tracking indices results in divergent exposures and potential returns for investors.

Conclusion

GXC and KWEB represent unique approaches to investing in the Chinese market, each catering to different investment preferences and risk appetites. As investors evaluate these ETFs, they can benefit from tools like ETF insider, which provides valuable insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other essential information. With its user-friendly app, ETF insider empowers investors to make informed decisions in an increasingly complex investment landscape.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

GXC ETF issuer
GXC ETF official page

Get started