KWEB VS ASHR: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
3 min read
By Beqa Bumbeishvili, ETF Insider

KWEB VS ASHR: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, offering investors diversified exposure across different sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) and ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF). We'll delve into various aspects, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

KWEB VS ASHR: Overview

KWEB and ASHR are two ETFs that provide exposure to China's dynamic economy, albeit with distinct focuses. KWEB concentrates on China's internet sector, while ASHR tracks the performance of China A-shares, stocks listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges. These differing approaches result in unique investment opportunities and risk profiles, which we'll explore in the subsequent sections.

KWEB VS ASHR: Sectors and Top Holdings

The KWEB ETF primarily targets the Chinese internet industry, investing in companies such as Tencent, Alibaba, and Meituan Dianping. In contrast, ASHR is centered around China's domestic A-share market, including holdings like Kweichow Moutai, Ping An Insurance, and China Merchants Bank. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs assists investors in aligning their investment goals with the right fund.

KWEB overlap KWEB VS ASHR: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFsKWEB overlap KWEB VS ASHR: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

KWEB VS ASHR: Capitalization and Strategy

KWEB boasts a significant asset under management (AUM) as it taps into the growth potential of China's internet giants. ASHR's strategy revolves around the performance of the CSI 300 Index, offering broad exposure to China A-shares. The difference in capitalization and strategy between KWEB and ASHR underscores their varying risk-return profiles, enabling investors to make informed decisions.

KWEB VS ASHR: Tracking and Exposure

KWEB aims to mirror the performance of an index that includes Chinese internet companies, providing investors with exposure to this high-growth sector. ASHR, on the other hand, tracks the CSI 300 Index, offering exposure to a diversified basket of Chinese A-shares. The tracking and exposure methods differ significantly, impacting potential returns and volatility for investors.

Conclusion

KWEB and ASHR represent distinct investment opportunities within China's rapidly evolving economy. To gain deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other crucial information, investors can turn to ETF Insider, an intuitive app designed to explore various financial instruments. Whether you're considering exposure to China's internet giants or the broader A-share market, ETF Insider offers valuable data to inform your investment decisions.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

KWEB ETF issuer
KWEB ETF official page

ASHR quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF, access our dedicated page now.

Get started